fix: CI compilation failed on substrait #10683
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
jonahgao
commented
May 27, 2024
| @@ -1411,15 +1411,15 @@ fn to_substrait_type(dt: &DataType, nullable: bool) -> Result<substrait::proto:: | |||
| parameter: Some(parameter::Parameter::DataType(substrait::proto::Type { | |||
| kind: Some(r#type::Kind::I32(r#type::I32 { | |||
| type_variation_reference: DEFAULT_TYPE_REF, | |||
| nullability: default_nullability, | |||
| nullability: r#type::Nullability::Unspecified as i32, | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We are not using the nullability of the parameter on the consumer side, so I temporarily change it to Unspecified.
waynexia
approved these changes
May 27, 2024
|
Thanks @jonahgao |
|
Thank you for the reviewing @jayzhan211 @waynexia |
findepi
pushed a commit
to findepi/datafusion
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 16, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Which issue does this PR close?
Closes #10682.
Rationale for this change
A merge conflict exists between #10640 and #10646.
What changes are included in this PR?
Fix compilation
Are these changes tested?
Yes
Are there any user-facing changes?
No