@@ -82,8 +82,8 @@ fn project_orderings_random() -> Result<()> {
8282 // Make sure each ordering after projection is valid.
8383 for ordering in projected_eq. oeq_class ( ) . iter ( ) {
8484 let err_msg = format ! (
85- "Error in test case ordering:{:?}, eq_properties.oeq_class: {:?}, eq_properties.eq_group: {:?}, eq_properties.constants: {:? }, proj_exprs: {:?}" ,
86- ordering, eq_properties. oeq_class , eq_properties . eq_group , eq_properties . constants , proj_exprs
85+ "Error in test case ordering:{:?}, eq_properties { }, proj_exprs: {:?}" ,
86+ ordering, eq_properties, proj_exprs,
8787 ) ;
8888 // Since ordered section satisfies schema, we expect
8989 // that result will be same after sort (e.g sort was unnecessary).
@@ -179,8 +179,8 @@ fn ordering_satisfy_after_projection_random() -> Result<()> {
179179 projected_batch. clone ( ) ,
180180 ) ?;
181181 let err_msg = format ! (
182- "Error in test case requirement:{:?}, expected: {:?}, eq_properties.oeq_class : {:? }, eq_properties.eq_group: {:?}, eq_properties.constants: {:?}, projected_eq.oeq_class : {:?}, projected_eq.eq_group: {:?}, projected_eq.constants: {:? }, projection_mapping: {:?}" ,
183- requirement, expected, eq_properties. oeq_class , eq_properties . eq_group , eq_properties . constants , projected_eq. oeq_class , projected_eq . eq_group , projected_eq . constants , projection_mapping
182+ "Error in test case requirement:{:?}, expected: {:?}, eq_properties: {}, projected_eq: {}, projection_mapping: {:?}" ,
183+ requirement, expected, eq_properties, projected_eq, projection_mapping
184184 ) ;
185185 // Check whether ordering_satisfy API result and
186186 // experimental result matches.
0 commit comments