-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ARROW-78: Add constructor for DecimalType #37
Closed
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Want to start a unit test file for decimals? I haven't really thought through the scope of what decimal functionality we might like to offer in Arrow. At least being able to support Parquet usages would be good. |
wesm
added a commit
to wesm/arrow
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 2, 2018
I twiddled this a bit to cut the runtime in half. I'd like to reduce it further but looking for feedback -- my preference would be to use system entropy (`std::random_device`) to seed the PRNG and print the seed on failure. So we could run far fewer tests (e.g. only 50 or 100 or so) and occasionally run into flakiness or failure if we refactor and break something internally. Thoughts? Author: Wes McKinney <wes@cloudera.com> Closes apache#37 from wesm/PARQUET-507 and squashes the following commits: d75f2ed [Wes McKinney] Tidying per comments 0ed951a [Wes McKinney] Buglet ba97491 [Wes McKinney] Further shorten random tests; use device entropy and print random seed on failure a357dd1 [Wes McKinney] Preallocate vector in BitRle.Random and run half as many iterations
wesm
added a commit
to wesm/arrow
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 4, 2018
I twiddled this a bit to cut the runtime in half. I'd like to reduce it further but looking for feedback -- my preference would be to use system entropy (`std::random_device`) to seed the PRNG and print the seed on failure. So we could run far fewer tests (e.g. only 50 or 100 or so) and occasionally run into flakiness or failure if we refactor and break something internally. Thoughts? Author: Wes McKinney <wes@cloudera.com> Closes apache#37 from wesm/PARQUET-507 and squashes the following commits: d75f2ed [Wes McKinney] Tidying per comments 0ed951a [Wes McKinney] Buglet ba97491 [Wes McKinney] Further shorten random tests; use device entropy and print random seed on failure a357dd1 [Wes McKinney] Preallocate vector in BitRle.Random and run half as many iterations Change-Id: I8454ada4337cf98793294632e14ebe96f73c5111
wesm
added a commit
to wesm/arrow
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 6, 2018
I twiddled this a bit to cut the runtime in half. I'd like to reduce it further but looking for feedback -- my preference would be to use system entropy (`std::random_device`) to seed the PRNG and print the seed on failure. So we could run far fewer tests (e.g. only 50 or 100 or so) and occasionally run into flakiness or failure if we refactor and break something internally. Thoughts? Author: Wes McKinney <wes@cloudera.com> Closes apache#37 from wesm/PARQUET-507 and squashes the following commits: d75f2ed [Wes McKinney] Tidying per comments 0ed951a [Wes McKinney] Buglet ba97491 [Wes McKinney] Further shorten random tests; use device entropy and print random seed on failure a357dd1 [Wes McKinney] Preallocate vector in BitRle.Random and run half as many iterations Change-Id: I8454ada4337cf98793294632e14ebe96f73c5111
wesm
added a commit
to wesm/arrow
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 7, 2018
I twiddled this a bit to cut the runtime in half. I'd like to reduce it further but looking for feedback -- my preference would be to use system entropy (`std::random_device`) to seed the PRNG and print the seed on failure. So we could run far fewer tests (e.g. only 50 or 100 or so) and occasionally run into flakiness or failure if we refactor and break something internally. Thoughts? Author: Wes McKinney <wes@cloudera.com> Closes apache#37 from wesm/PARQUET-507 and squashes the following commits: d75f2ed [Wes McKinney] Tidying per comments 0ed951a [Wes McKinney] Buglet ba97491 [Wes McKinney] Further shorten random tests; use device entropy and print random seed on failure a357dd1 [Wes McKinney] Preallocate vector in BitRle.Random and run half as many iterations Change-Id: I8454ada4337cf98793294632e14ebe96f73c5111
wesm
added a commit
to wesm/arrow
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 8, 2018
I twiddled this a bit to cut the runtime in half. I'd like to reduce it further but looking for feedback -- my preference would be to use system entropy (`std::random_device`) to seed the PRNG and print the seed on failure. So we could run far fewer tests (e.g. only 50 or 100 or so) and occasionally run into flakiness or failure if we refactor and break something internally. Thoughts? Author: Wes McKinney <wes@cloudera.com> Closes apache#37 from wesm/PARQUET-507 and squashes the following commits: d75f2ed [Wes McKinney] Tidying per comments 0ed951a [Wes McKinney] Buglet ba97491 [Wes McKinney] Further shorten random tests; use device entropy and print random seed on failure a357dd1 [Wes McKinney] Preallocate vector in BitRle.Random and run half as many iterations Change-Id: I8454ada4337cf98793294632e14ebe96f73c5111
kou
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 10, 2020
This PR enables tests for `ARROW_COMPUTE`, `ARROW_DATASET`, `ARROW_FILESYSTEM`, `ARROW_HDFS`, `ARROW_ORC`, and `ARROW_IPC` (default on). #7131 enabled a minimal set of tests as a starting point. I confirmed that these tests pass locally with the current master. In the current TravisCI environment, we cannot see this result due to a lot of error messages in `arrow-utility-test`. ``` $ git log | head -1 commit ed5f534 % ctest ... Start 1: arrow-array-test 1/51 Test #1: arrow-array-test ..................... Passed 4.62 sec Start 2: arrow-buffer-test 2/51 Test #2: arrow-buffer-test .................... Passed 0.14 sec Start 3: arrow-extension-type-test 3/51 Test #3: arrow-extension-type-test ............ Passed 0.12 sec Start 4: arrow-misc-test 4/51 Test #4: arrow-misc-test ...................... Passed 0.14 sec Start 5: arrow-public-api-test 5/51 Test #5: arrow-public-api-test ................ Passed 0.12 sec Start 6: arrow-scalar-test 6/51 Test #6: arrow-scalar-test .................... Passed 0.13 sec Start 7: arrow-type-test 7/51 Test #7: arrow-type-test ...................... Passed 0.14 sec Start 8: arrow-table-test 8/51 Test #8: arrow-table-test ..................... Passed 0.13 sec Start 9: arrow-tensor-test 9/51 Test #9: arrow-tensor-test .................... Passed 0.13 sec Start 10: arrow-sparse-tensor-test 10/51 Test #10: arrow-sparse-tensor-test ............. Passed 0.16 sec Start 11: arrow-stl-test 11/51 Test #11: arrow-stl-test ....................... Passed 0.12 sec Start 12: arrow-concatenate-test 12/51 Test #12: arrow-concatenate-test ............... Passed 0.53 sec Start 13: arrow-diff-test 13/51 Test #13: arrow-diff-test ...................... Passed 1.45 sec Start 14: arrow-c-bridge-test 14/51 Test #14: arrow-c-bridge-test .................. Passed 0.18 sec Start 15: arrow-io-buffered-test 15/51 Test #15: arrow-io-buffered-test ............... Passed 0.20 sec Start 16: arrow-io-compressed-test 16/51 Test #16: arrow-io-compressed-test ............. Passed 3.48 sec Start 17: arrow-io-file-test 17/51 Test #17: arrow-io-file-test ................... Passed 0.74 sec Start 18: arrow-io-hdfs-test 18/51 Test #18: arrow-io-hdfs-test ................... Passed 0.12 sec Start 19: arrow-io-memory-test 19/51 Test #19: arrow-io-memory-test ................. Passed 2.77 sec Start 20: arrow-utility-test 20/51 Test #20: arrow-utility-test ...................***Failed 5.65 sec Start 21: arrow-threading-utility-test 21/51 Test #21: arrow-threading-utility-test ......... Passed 1.34 sec Start 22: arrow-compute-compute-test 22/51 Test #22: arrow-compute-compute-test ........... Passed 0.13 sec Start 23: arrow-compute-boolean-test 23/51 Test #23: arrow-compute-boolean-test ........... Passed 0.15 sec Start 24: arrow-compute-cast-test 24/51 Test #24: arrow-compute-cast-test .............. Passed 0.22 sec Start 25: arrow-compute-hash-test 25/51 Test #25: arrow-compute-hash-test .............. Passed 2.61 sec Start 26: arrow-compute-isin-test 26/51 Test #26: arrow-compute-isin-test .............. Passed 0.81 sec Start 27: arrow-compute-match-test 27/51 Test #27: arrow-compute-match-test ............. Passed 0.40 sec Start 28: arrow-compute-sort-to-indices-test 28/51 Test #28: arrow-compute-sort-to-indices-test ... Passed 3.33 sec Start 29: arrow-compute-nth-to-indices-test 29/51 Test #29: arrow-compute-nth-to-indices-test .... Passed 1.51 sec Start 30: arrow-compute-util-internal-test 30/51 Test #30: arrow-compute-util-internal-test ..... Passed 0.13 sec Start 31: arrow-compute-add-test 31/51 Test #31: arrow-compute-add-test ............... Passed 0.12 sec Start 32: arrow-compute-aggregate-test 32/51 Test #32: arrow-compute-aggregate-test ......... Passed 14.70 sec Start 33: arrow-compute-compare-test 33/51 Test #33: arrow-compute-compare-test ........... Passed 7.96 sec Start 34: arrow-compute-take-test 34/51 Test #34: arrow-compute-take-test .............. Passed 4.80 sec Start 35: arrow-compute-filter-test 35/51 Test #35: arrow-compute-filter-test ............ Passed 8.23 sec Start 36: arrow-dataset-dataset-test 36/51 Test #36: arrow-dataset-dataset-test ........... Passed 0.25 sec Start 37: arrow-dataset-discovery-test 37/51 Test #37: arrow-dataset-discovery-test ......... Passed 0.13 sec Start 38: arrow-dataset-file-ipc-test 38/51 Test #38: arrow-dataset-file-ipc-test .......... Passed 0.21 sec Start 39: arrow-dataset-file-test 39/51 Test #39: arrow-dataset-file-test .............. Passed 0.12 sec Start 40: arrow-dataset-filter-test 40/51 Test #40: arrow-dataset-filter-test ............ Passed 0.16 sec Start 41: arrow-dataset-partition-test 41/51 Test #41: arrow-dataset-partition-test ......... Passed 0.13 sec Start 42: arrow-dataset-scanner-test 42/51 Test #42: arrow-dataset-scanner-test ........... Passed 0.20 sec Start 43: arrow-filesystem-test 43/51 Test #43: arrow-filesystem-test ................ Passed 1.62 sec Start 44: arrow-hdfs-test 44/51 Test #44: arrow-hdfs-test ...................... Passed 0.13 sec Start 45: arrow-feather-test 45/51 Test #45: arrow-feather-test ................... Passed 0.91 sec Start 46: arrow-ipc-read-write-test 46/51 Test #46: arrow-ipc-read-write-test ............ Passed 5.77 sec Start 47: arrow-ipc-json-simple-test 47/51 Test #47: arrow-ipc-json-simple-test ........... Passed 0.16 sec Start 48: arrow-ipc-json-test 48/51 Test #48: arrow-ipc-json-test .................. Passed 0.27 sec Start 49: arrow-json-integration-test 49/51 Test #49: arrow-json-integration-test .......... Passed 0.13 sec Start 50: arrow-json-test 50/51 Test #50: arrow-json-test ...................... Passed 0.26 sec Start 51: arrow-orc-adapter-test 51/51 Test #51: arrow-orc-adapter-test ............... Passed 1.92 sec 98% tests passed, 1 tests failed out of 51 Label Time Summary: arrow-tests = 27.38 sec (27 tests) arrow_compute = 45.11 sec (14 tests) arrow_dataset = 1.21 sec (7 tests) arrow_ipc = 6.20 sec (3 tests) unittest = 79.91 sec (51 tests) Total Test time (real) = 79.99 sec The following tests FAILED: 20 - arrow-utility-test (Failed) Errors while running CTest ``` Closes #7142 from kiszk/ARROW-8754 Authored-by: Kazuaki Ishizaki <ishizaki@jp.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Sutou Kouhei <kou@clear-code.com>
zhouyuan
added a commit
to zhouyuan/arrow
that referenced
this pull request
May 15, 2020
[C++][Gandiva] fix overflow on date32
jayhomn-bitquill
pushed a commit
to Bit-Quill/arrow
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 10, 2022
Fix struct type on jdbc
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.