Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ARROW-297: Fix Arrow pom for release #140

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

julienledem
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@jaltekruse
Copy link

+1

@asfgit asfgit closed this in 5f1556c Sep 19, 2016
@julienledem julienledem deleted the fix_pom_for_release branch April 25, 2017 18:30
wesm pushed a commit to wesm/arrow that referenced this pull request Sep 2, 2018
Testing on my own data shows an order-of-magnitude improvement.

I separated the commits for clarity, each one gives an imcremental improvement.

The motivation for the last commit (allowing NULL for def_levels/rep_level) is a workaround for Spark  which doesn't seem to be able to generate columns without def_level, even when a column is specified as "not nullable".

Author: Eric Daniel <edaniel@comscore.com>

Closes apache#140 from edani/decode-perf and squashes the following commits:

eec0855 [Eric Daniel] Ran "make format"
0568de6 [Eric Daniel] Only check num. of repetition levels when def_levels is set
5f54e1c [Eric Daniel] Added benchmarks for dictionary decoding
087945b [Eric Daniel] Style fixes from code review
906be73 [Eric Daniel] Allow the reader to skip rep/def decoding
04b7391 [Eric Daniel] Fast bit unpacking
bda5d84 [Eric Daniel] The bit reader can decode in batches
3f10378 [Eric Daniel] Improve decoding of repeated values in the dict encoding
wesm pushed a commit to wesm/arrow that referenced this pull request Sep 4, 2018
Testing on my own data shows an order-of-magnitude improvement.

I separated the commits for clarity, each one gives an imcremental improvement.

The motivation for the last commit (allowing NULL for def_levels/rep_level) is a workaround for Spark  which doesn't seem to be able to generate columns without def_level, even when a column is specified as "not nullable".

Author: Eric Daniel <edaniel@comscore.com>

Closes apache#140 from edani/decode-perf and squashes the following commits:

eec0855 [Eric Daniel] Ran "make format"
0568de6 [Eric Daniel] Only check num. of repetition levels when def_levels is set
5f54e1c [Eric Daniel] Added benchmarks for dictionary decoding
087945b [Eric Daniel] Style fixes from code review
906be73 [Eric Daniel] Allow the reader to skip rep/def decoding
04b7391 [Eric Daniel] Fast bit unpacking
bda5d84 [Eric Daniel] The bit reader can decode in batches
3f10378 [Eric Daniel] Improve decoding of repeated values in the dict encoding

Change-Id: I45421fc2ada5d06863ddd765470f79b45ec4991a
wesm pushed a commit to wesm/arrow that referenced this pull request Sep 6, 2018
Testing on my own data shows an order-of-magnitude improvement.

I separated the commits for clarity, each one gives an imcremental improvement.

The motivation for the last commit (allowing NULL for def_levels/rep_level) is a workaround for Spark  which doesn't seem to be able to generate columns without def_level, even when a column is specified as "not nullable".

Author: Eric Daniel <edaniel@comscore.com>

Closes apache#140 from edani/decode-perf and squashes the following commits:

eec0855 [Eric Daniel] Ran "make format"
0568de6 [Eric Daniel] Only check num. of repetition levels when def_levels is set
5f54e1c [Eric Daniel] Added benchmarks for dictionary decoding
087945b [Eric Daniel] Style fixes from code review
906be73 [Eric Daniel] Allow the reader to skip rep/def decoding
04b7391 [Eric Daniel] Fast bit unpacking
bda5d84 [Eric Daniel] The bit reader can decode in batches
3f10378 [Eric Daniel] Improve decoding of repeated values in the dict encoding

Change-Id: I45421fc2ada5d06863ddd765470f79b45ec4991a
wesm pushed a commit to wesm/arrow that referenced this pull request Sep 7, 2018
Testing on my own data shows an order-of-magnitude improvement.

I separated the commits for clarity, each one gives an imcremental improvement.

The motivation for the last commit (allowing NULL for def_levels/rep_level) is a workaround for Spark  which doesn't seem to be able to generate columns without def_level, even when a column is specified as "not nullable".

Author: Eric Daniel <edaniel@comscore.com>

Closes apache#140 from edani/decode-perf and squashes the following commits:

eec0855 [Eric Daniel] Ran "make format"
0568de6 [Eric Daniel] Only check num. of repetition levels when def_levels is set
5f54e1c [Eric Daniel] Added benchmarks for dictionary decoding
087945b [Eric Daniel] Style fixes from code review
906be73 [Eric Daniel] Allow the reader to skip rep/def decoding
04b7391 [Eric Daniel] Fast bit unpacking
bda5d84 [Eric Daniel] The bit reader can decode in batches
3f10378 [Eric Daniel] Improve decoding of repeated values in the dict encoding

Change-Id: I45421fc2ada5d06863ddd765470f79b45ec4991a
wesm pushed a commit to wesm/arrow that referenced this pull request Sep 8, 2018
Testing on my own data shows an order-of-magnitude improvement.

I separated the commits for clarity, each one gives an imcremental improvement.

The motivation for the last commit (allowing NULL for def_levels/rep_level) is a workaround for Spark  which doesn't seem to be able to generate columns without def_level, even when a column is specified as "not nullable".

Author: Eric Daniel <edaniel@comscore.com>

Closes apache#140 from edani/decode-perf and squashes the following commits:

eec0855 [Eric Daniel] Ran "make format"
0568de6 [Eric Daniel] Only check num. of repetition levels when def_levels is set
5f54e1c [Eric Daniel] Added benchmarks for dictionary decoding
087945b [Eric Daniel] Style fixes from code review
906be73 [Eric Daniel] Allow the reader to skip rep/def decoding
04b7391 [Eric Daniel] Fast bit unpacking
bda5d84 [Eric Daniel] The bit reader can decode in batches
3f10378 [Eric Daniel] Improve decoding of repeated values in the dict encoding

Change-Id: I45421fc2ada5d06863ddd765470f79b45ec4991a
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants