Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support request for the new version of Semantic-Release #16

Closed
pplancq opened this issue Feb 14, 2024 · 4 comments
Closed

Support request for the new version of Semantic-Release #16

pplancq opened this issue Feb 14, 2024 · 4 comments
Labels
bot: closed c: feature Request for new feature s: pending triage Pending Triage s: waiting for user interest Waiting for more users interested in this feature

Comments

@pplancq
Copy link

pplancq commented Feb 14, 2024

Clear and concise description of the problem

I would like to know if it would be possible for the package to be updated to support the new version of semantic-release@23.

Suggested solution

I think just updating the peerdeps section of the package.json should be enough.

Alternative

No response

Additional context

I'd like to take this opportunity to thank the developer for his work on this library. It has been incredibly useful in my projects.

Upvote & Fund

  • We're using Polar.sh so you can upvote and help fund this issue.
  • We receive the funding once the issue is completed & confirmed by you.
  • Thank you in advance for helping prioritize & fund our backlog.
Fund with Polar
@pplancq pplancq added c: feature Request for new feature s: pending triage Pending Triage s: waiting for user interest Waiting for more users interested in this feature labels Feb 14, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you for your feature proposal.

We marked it as "waiting for user interest" for now to gather some feedback from our community:

- If you would like to see this feature be implemented, please react to the description with an up-vote (:+1:).
- If you have a suggestion or want to point out some special cases that need to be considered, please leave a comment, so we are aware about them.

We would also like to hear about other community members' use cases for the feature to give us a better understanding of their potential implicit or explicit requirements.

We will start the implementation based on:

- the number of votes (:+1:) and comments
- the relevance for the ecosystem
- availability of alternatives and workarounds
- and the complexity of the requested feature

We do this because:

- There are plenty of frameworks/tools out there and we would like to ensure that every method can cover all or almost all of them.
- Every feature we add to Visulima has "costs" associated to it:
    - initial costs: design, implementation, reviews, documentation
    - running costs: awareness of the feature itself, more complex module structure, increased bundle size, more work during refactors

---

[View more issues which are waiting for user interest](https://github.com/visulima/visulima/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3A%22s%3A+waiting+for+user+interest%22+)

Copy link
Contributor

Awesome! Thank you for taking the time to create your first issue! Please review the guidelines

@pplancq
Copy link
Author

pplancq commented Feb 15, 2024

Oops I'm sorry but I hadn't noticed that the peerDependencies were in >=22.0.3 and that version 23 was therefore compatible.

I apologize for the inconvenience.

@pplancq pplancq closed this as completed Feb 15, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

This issue has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.
Please note this issue tracker is not a help forum. We recommend using our GitHub Discussions tab for questions.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators May 22, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
bot: closed c: feature Request for new feature s: pending triage Pending Triage s: waiting for user interest Waiting for more users interested in this feature
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant