Skip to content

chore(demo): add examples to demo app #10743

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 26, 2018

Conversation

andrewseguin
Copy link
Contributor

@andrewseguin andrewseguin commented Apr 6, 2018

Includes changes in PR #10739

Adds all examples to an example page on the demo app.

2msgfpxfp3x

@googlebot googlebot added the cla: yes PR author has agreed to Google's Contributor License Agreement label Apr 6, 2018
@andrewseguin andrewseguin added pr: needs review target: patch This PR is targeted for the next patch release labels Apr 6, 2018
@josephperrott josephperrott removed their request for review April 9, 2018 15:31
@jelbourn
Copy link
Member

I'm concerned this will make the demo-app super slow.

Does it make the demo app super slow?

@andrewseguin
Copy link
Contributor Author

Based on a rough experiment, I found that it took the following number of seconds to refresh the demo app and open the main sidenav:

On master: 16.0s, 15.9s, 16.0s
With this PR: 16.8s, 16.6s

So maybe half a second longer. Then again I might have grown a tired finger pushing the start button my stopwatch =)

Overall, no real perceptible difference.

Copy link
Member

@jelbourn jelbourn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@@ -56,7 +59,7 @@ import {SnackBarDemo} from '../snack-bar/snack-bar-demo';
import {StepperDemo} from '../stepper/stepper-demo';
import {TableDemoModule} from '../table/table-demo-module';
import {
Counter, FoggyTabContent, RainyTabContent, SunnyTabContent, TabsDemo
Counter,FoggyTabContent, RainyTabContent, SunnyTabContent, TabsDemo
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Formatting

@jelbourn jelbourn added pr: lgtm action: merge The PR is ready for merge by the caretaker and removed pr: needs review labels Apr 25, 2018
@ngbot
Copy link

ngbot bot commented Apr 25, 2018

I see that you just added the pr: merge ready label, but the following checks are still failing:
    failure status "continuous-integration/travis-ci/pr" is failing
    pending 3 pending code reviews

If you want your PR to be merged, it has to pass all the CI checks.

If you can't get the PR to a green state due to flakes or broken master, please try rebasing to master and/or restarting the CI job. If that fails and you believe that the issue is not due to your change, please contact the caretaker and ask for help.

@andrewseguin andrewseguin merged commit 68b1f2a into angular:master Apr 26, 2018
andrewseguin added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 26, 2018
andrewseguin added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 26, 2018
@angular-automatic-lock-bot
Copy link

This issue has been automatically locked due to inactivity.
Please file a new issue if you are encountering a similar or related problem.

Read more about our automatic conversation locking policy.

This action has been performed automatically by a bot.

@angular-automatic-lock-bot angular-automatic-lock-bot bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 8, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
action: merge The PR is ready for merge by the caretaker cla: yes PR author has agreed to Google's Contributor License Agreement target: patch This PR is targeted for the next patch release
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants