You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
| Project Management with collaboration features | ✓ ||
136
+
| Project Management with collaboration features | ✓ |✓ |
137
137
| Python-based | ✓ ||
138
138
| Simple Login/Sign-on | ✓ ||
139
139
| Supports multiple tasks | ✓ ||
140
+
| Communication tools (e.g. annotators interaction with project managers) || ✓ |
141
+
|-|-|-|
142
+
| Documentation (e.g. forums, example setup) || ✓ |
143
+
| Built-in quality control (e.g. screening tests, data cleanup/filer) || ✓ |
144
+
| Demo/test small projects with least setup effort || ✓ |
145
+
| Access to large/diverse/global pool of annotators || ✓ |
140
146
141
147
142
148
The keywords **flexibility** and **ease**/**easy**/**simple** appears in many of the comments to list the top features for annotation platform. We suggest the following for annotation tools creators to accomodate these feedbacks:
@@ -150,3 +156,4 @@ Another recurring theme in the top feature list includes:
150
156
- Respondents highlighting ability to annotate (i) overlapping spans, (ii) discontinuous spans, (iii) corrections to initial tokenizations (iv) entity relation annotations
151
157
- In cases where free text annotation is allowed, some sort of respondents highlighted **need for constraints/limitations of free text**
0 commit comments