You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am no languistical expert to say, if there is any language existing, where different characters are used as hyphen to need to outline possible alternatives. Anyway I personally think it is again a very rare case. But I see no problem nor conflict with other alternatives or similar. So for me it would be fine to extend the HYP as well.
In older prints (mostly C16-C18), often variations of hyphens or the "double oblique hyphen" Unicode U+2E17 have been used as a hyphen. Since Unicode also distinguishes at least a dozen different hyphens, I would say it makes sense to allow variants for hyphens too.
Good point as use-case, even I would expect to have the OCR result corrected consistent for such material then to equal sign and prevent alternatives. ;-D
Separated from #26 (comment) (introduction of glyphs)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: