Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add type checking via mypy in CI #114

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Jul 6, 2024
Merged

Conversation

PeterJCLaw
Copy link
Collaborator

Builds on #113, suggest reviewing that first.

This gets the codebase to passing mypy checks, ready for perhaps making the mypy check blocking and/or publishing the type annotations (via py.typed marker file)

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

⚠️ Please install the 'codecov app svg image' to ensure uploads and comments are reliably processed by Codecov.

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 98.30%. Comparing base (533f292) to head (d7cf5e4).

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #114   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   98.29%   98.30%           
=======================================
  Files          34       35    +1     
  Lines        1352     1357    +5     
=======================================
+ Hits         1329     1334    +5     
  Misses         23       23           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@PeterJCLaw PeterJCLaw marked this pull request as ready for review July 6, 2024 17:31
@alm0ra alm0ra merged commit 60d328c into alm0ra:main Jul 6, 2024
10 checks passed
@PeterJCLaw PeterJCLaw deleted the type-check branch July 6, 2024 20:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants