-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 182
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Option to not merge to master for release-finish #107
Comments
Looks same as #97. Why not to use |
Good point! The only advantage of using release branch is because we do actually releases from this branch and we also get auto-merge feature to develop-branch within Atlassian Bitbucket, when we create Pull Requests to merge from bugfix -> release branch |
having the same issue here. Any new thoughts here? |
@hypery2k Do you really need a release branch? Feature/support/hotfix/some other branch maybe? BTW the |
I'm using the option for now, so from my side no need for the issue as it can be resolved with the help of the option |
Duplicate of #74, which is resolved by now. |
Hi, thanks for great plugin!
Is it possible to do the merge, for goal
release-finish
, only to development (develop
), but not production (master
)? We don´t want to merge anrelease
tomaster
branch which is not yet tested (performance test, manual tests, etc) in an test environment. In addition we do not allow push to master without Pull Requests.Since
release-finish
goal automatically merge to develop and master, after creating an release, it is difficult to achieve this.Any suggestions?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: