-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
clean up sample vs. draw in output and doc #91
Comments
Comment by maverickg I still remember we had this discussion about sample. I thought in most cases, we are referring to multiple chains. So I have to use samples there. |
Comment by betanalpha I would avoid the phrase "draw" altogether as it has the physical connotation of an exact sample. Instead stick with "transition"
|
Comment by ariddell I'd support switching from |
Comment by betanalpha Hmm, actually I might recant slightly as there is a difference between "samples" and "exact samples". This is worth discussing in person (and maybe waiting until after I finish this intro to probability theory and computation draft). |
Comment by bob-carpenter OK, when you and Andrew hash it out, let me know, and we |
Issue by bob-carpenter
Monday Mar 14, 2016 at 17:21 GMT
Originally opened as stan-dev/stan#1801
Summary:
We want to follow Andrew's terminology and not confuse a sample (1 or more draws) with a draw.
Description:
Reproducible Steps:
Just run CmdStan.
Current Output:
From CmdStan:
From RStan:
Expected Output:
CmdStan:
num_draws = 1000
RStan:
Sample was drawn using NUTS.
Current Version:
v2.9.0
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: