chore: fix typing issues

[aaronsteers]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features

  • Enhanced handling of stream configurations for improved clarity and error reduction.
  • Improved flexibility in incremental sync checks with nullable types.

• Bug Fixes

  • Refined error handling for concurrency levels and stream state management.

• Documentation

  • Updated method signatures for better understanding and usability.

[coderabbitai]

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces modifications to the ConcurrentDeclarativeSource class in the airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/concurrent_declarative_source.py file. Key changes include enhancements to stream configuration handling, improvements in the logic for concurrent and synchronous streams, and refinements in error handling. The _group_streams method has been updated for better stream configuration retrieval, while the _is_datetime_incremental_without_partition_routing method now accepts nullable types. Additionally, the read method has been adjusted to preserve stream names, and constructor error handling has been strengthened.

Changes

File Path	Change Summary
airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/concurrent_declarative_source.py	- Updated _group_streams for improved stream configuration retrieval. - Modified _is_datetime_incremental_without_partition_routing to accept nullable types. - Adjusted read method to preserve names of concurrent streams. - Enhanced error handling in the constructor for ConcurrencyLevel.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant ConcurrentDeclarativeSource
    participant StreamRetriever

    User->>ConcurrentDeclarativeSource: Initialize with stream config
    ConcurrentDeclarativeSource->>StreamRetriever: Retrieve stream configurations
    StreamRetriever-->>ConcurrentDeclarativeSource: Return stream mappings
    ConcurrentDeclarativeSource->>ConcurrentDeclarativeSource: Group streams
    ConcurrentDeclarativeSource->>ConcurrentDeclarativeSource: Check incremental sync support
    ConcurrentDeclarativeSource->>User: Stream data ready for sync

Loading

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

‼️ IMPORTANT
Auto-reply has been disabled for this repository in the CodeRabbit settings. The CodeRabbit bot will not respond to your replies unless it is explicitly tagged.

• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)

airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/concurrent_declarative_source.py (1)

240-240: Could we adjust the type annotations to avoid using # type: ignore?

In the line where component_definition=incremental_sync_component_definition # type: ignore is used, would it make sense to refine the type annotations or modify the code to eliminate the need for the type ignore comment? Wdyt?

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a07b04a and 0cde336.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/concurrent_declarative_source.py (4 hunks)

🔇 Additional comments (3)

airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/concurrent_declarative_source.py (3)

209-209: Should we ensure safe access to the stream mapping keys to prevent potential KeyErrors?

When accessing name_to_stream_mapping[declarative_stream.name]["retriever"]["type"], is there a possibility that any of these keys might be missing? Perhaps using .get() methods or adding checks could help avoid potential exceptions. Wdyt?

---

218-218: Is there a risk of KeyError when accessing name_to_stream_mapping[declarative_stream.name]?

Similar to the previous point, should we verify that declarative_stream.name exists in name_to_stream_mapping before accessing it directly? This might help in preventing unexpected errors. What do you think?

---

323-327: Great job on enhancing the method's robustness!

Accepting a nullable type for incremental_sync_component_definition and adding the null checks improves the code's reliability.

[maxi297]

LGTM!