-
-
Couldn't load subscription status.
- Fork 2.1k
Right way of keeping module from destruction #11715
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #11715 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 98.73% 98.73%
=======================================
Files 127 127
Lines 43558 43558
Branches 2320 2320
=======================================
+ Hits 43007 43008 +1
Misses 390 390
+ Partials 161 160 -1
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
CodSpeed Performance ReportMerging #11715 will not alter performanceComparing Summary
|
What exception? (your reproducer is not complete, and doesn't seem to reproduce on my machine) |
|
I had to look up why this was used in the first place. For anyone else, relevant part of the docs:
|
To reproduce:
What do these changes do?
Fixes Exception ignored in sys.unraisablehook:
You should store the function not the module.
Are there changes in behavior for the user?
No.
No.
Is it a substantial burden for the maintainers to support this?
No.
No.