[DOC] Fix inconsistent double backticks in similarity_search module (#809)

[adityagh006]

This PR addresses issue #809 by standardizing the use of double backticks (``) for inline code references in the similarity_search module. Previously, some docstrings inconsistently used single backticks (`), which rendered text as italics instead of formatted code.

Changes made:
Replaced inconsistent single backticks with double backticks for inline code references.
Ensured uniform formatting across the following files:
aeon/similarity_search/base.py
aeon/similarity_search/distance_profiles/euclidean_distance_profile.py
aeon/similarity_search/distance_profiles/squared_distance_profile.py
aeon/similarity_search/matrix_profiles/stomp.py
aeon/similarity_search/query_search.py
aeon/similarity_search/series_search.py
Maintained readability and adherence to the Aeon documentation guidelines.
This update improves the clarity of API documentation and aligns with the preferred style for referring to code elements.

[aeon-actions-bot]

Thank you for contributing to aeon

I have added the following labels to this PR based on the title: [ $\color{#F3B9F8}{\textsf{documentation}}$ ].
I have added the following labels to this PR based on the changes made: [ $\color{#006b75}{\textsf{similarity search}}$ ]. Feel free to change these if they do not properly represent the PR.

The Checks tab will show the status of our automated tests. You can click on individual test runs in the tab or "Details" in the panel below to see more information if there is a failure.

If our pre-commit code quality check fails, any trivial fixes will automatically be pushed to your PR unless it is a draft.

Don't hesitate to ask questions on the aeon Slack channel if you have any.

PR CI actions

These checkboxes will add labels to enable/disable CI functionality for this PR. This may not take effect immediately, and a new commit may be required to run the new configuration.

• Run pre-commit checks for all files
• Run mypy typecheck tests
• Run all pytest tests and configurations
• Run all notebook example tests
• Run numba-disabled codecov tests
• Stop automatic pre-commit fixes (always disabled for drafts)
• Disable numba cache loading
• Push an empty commit to re-run CI checks

[adityagh006]

Hi @baraline, it looks like tj-actions/changed-files@v45 couldn't be fetched, possibly due to a version issue. Updating it to v44 or v46 in .github/workflows/pre-commit.yml might help. Let me know how to proceed!

[baraline]

Hi, I'd wait for #2473 to be in for this PR to go through, as it will rework the module completely. Regarding the precommit issue, this is something we'll fix as it is currently affecting other PRs

[adityagh006]

Hi @baraline,

The changes in this PR address issue #809 by standardizing the use of double backticks for inline code references in the similarity_search module. I’ve replaced inconsistent single backticks with double backticks across the relevant files.

Since the CI checks have passed and the changes are ready for review, could you kindly review and approve the PR when possible?

[MatthewMiddlehurst]

In-case this was not clear in the previous message, the vast majority of this code is due to be removed or significantly changed. We probably won't review this because its never going to see a release even if merged. I'll keep this open for now so its visible for GSoC purposes if that is relevant, but it will likely be closed.

[adityagh006]

Thanks for the clarification, @MatthewMiddlehurst. I understand that the module is scheduled for major changes and that this PR may not be merged. I appreciate you keeping it open for visibility in the context of GSoC.

[baraline]

Hi @adityagh006, do you intend to work on this again ? The PR updating the code have been merged.

[adityagh006]

Yeah, sure! I’ll sync my branch with the latest changes and update the PR accordingly. Thanks for the heads-up!

[adityagh006]

Hi @baraline,
I’m working on the similarity_search module and noticed the structure has changed a lot. Could you confirm which files need to be updated for the tick inconsistency task?

[baraline]

Hi, i think you can check most files, that are not tests, you may find some work to do on those. Dont have any specifics sorry

[adityagh006]

Hi @baraline,
I've updated the PR to reflect the latest changes in the similarity_search module and standardized the inconsistent backticks as discussed. All checks have passed successfully. Kindly review when convenient. Thanks!

[baraline]

Thanks lgtm