Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[META]: Feature Roadmap #432

Open
alexander-alvarez opened this issue Jun 15, 2017 · 3 comments
Open

[META]: Feature Roadmap #432

alexander-alvarez opened this issue Jun 15, 2017 · 3 comments

Comments

@alexander-alvarez
Copy link
Collaborator

alexander-alvarez commented Jun 15, 2017

I think we've done a good job of making ember-light-table feature rich and extensible.
Opening this issue to create an open area for discussion around where we see ELT going and to give transparency to the community as to what they can expect in some sort of future.

Large Features Under Pseudo-active Development

Roadmap

Any and all suggestions are welcome.

@alexander-alvarez alexander-alvarez changed the title [Meta]: Feature Roadmap [META]: Feature Roadmap Jun 15, 2017
@buschtoens
Copy link
Collaborator

buschtoens commented Jun 16, 2017

Freezing columns

Can you elaborate a bit, what you mean by that? :)

After integrating vertical-collection, proper support for horizontal scrolling (#284) seems like a good next big goal.

Following that, I'd be interested in exploring sticky rows and columns (#434).

@offirgolan
Copy link
Collaborator

Modular behaviors + Keyboard support #347
Integrate vertical collection for rendering performance. Work being done here

I think bringing these two should be the MVP for a 2.0 release along with some general refactoring.

proper support for horizontal scrolling (#284) seems like a good next big goal.

+1

Freezing columns (after vertical collection is implemented)

This should be implemented after the first two as it is solely dependent on how we render the rest of the table.

"Out of the box" column and cell types

These would be good but maybe we can do it in a 3rd party addon? That way others can easily contribute and it will also be forced to use the public API.

@alexander-alvarez
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Yup we're all talking & thinking about the same things. I updated the OP

These would be good but maybe we can do it in a 3rd party addon? That way others can easily contribute and it will also be forced to use the public API.

✔️ First would be figuring out what all is out there, and then organizing them into addons.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants