Skip to content

docs(progress-bar): documentation updates #5553

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 11 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

cdransf
Copy link
Member

@cdransf cdransf commented Jun 18, 2025

Description

Improving the accessibility documentation of components.

Related issue(s)

SWC-398

Author's checklist

  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING and PULL_REQUESTS documents.
  • I have reviewed at the Accessibility Practices for this feature, see: Aria Practices
  • I have added automated tests to cover my changes.
  • I have included a well-written changeset if my change needs to be published.
  • I have included updated documentation if my change required it.

Reviewer's checklist

  • Includes a Github Issue with appropriate flag or Jira ticket number without a link
  • Includes thoughtfully written changeset if changes suggested include patch, minor, or major features
  • Automated tests cover all use cases and follow best practices for writing
  • Validated on all supported browsers
  • All VRTs are approved before the author can update Golden Hash

Device review

  • Did it pass in Desktop?
  • Did it pass in (emulated) Mobile?
  • Did it pass in (emulated) iPad?

@cdransf cdransf self-assigned this Jun 18, 2025
@cdransf cdransf added the WIP label Jun 18, 2025
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Jun 18, 2025

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: a4f9388

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 84 packages
Name Type
@spectrum-web-components/progress-bar Patch
@spectrum-web-components/bundle Patch
documentation Patch
@spectrum-web-components/eslint-plugin Patch
@spectrum-web-components/accordion Patch
@spectrum-web-components/action-bar Patch
@spectrum-web-components/action-button Patch
@spectrum-web-components/action-group Patch
@spectrum-web-components/action-menu Patch
@spectrum-web-components/alert-banner Patch
@spectrum-web-components/alert-dialog Patch
@spectrum-web-components/asset Patch
@spectrum-web-components/avatar Patch
@spectrum-web-components/badge Patch
@spectrum-web-components/breadcrumbs Patch
@spectrum-web-components/button-group Patch
@spectrum-web-components/button Patch
@spectrum-web-components/card Patch
@spectrum-web-components/checkbox Patch
@spectrum-web-components/clear-button Patch
@spectrum-web-components/close-button Patch
@spectrum-web-components/coachmark Patch
@spectrum-web-components/color-area Patch
@spectrum-web-components/color-field Patch
@spectrum-web-components/color-handle Patch
@spectrum-web-components/color-loupe Patch
@spectrum-web-components/color-slider Patch
@spectrum-web-components/color-wheel Patch
@spectrum-web-components/combobox Patch
@spectrum-web-components/contextual-help Patch
@spectrum-web-components/dialog Patch
@spectrum-web-components/divider Patch
@spectrum-web-components/dropzone Patch
@spectrum-web-components/field-group Patch
@spectrum-web-components/field-label Patch
@spectrum-web-components/help-text Patch
@spectrum-web-components/icon Patch
@spectrum-web-components/icons-ui Patch
@spectrum-web-components/icons-workflow Patch
@spectrum-web-components/icons Patch
@spectrum-web-components/iconset Patch
@spectrum-web-components/illustrated-message Patch
@spectrum-web-components/infield-button Patch
@spectrum-web-components/link Patch
@spectrum-web-components/menu Patch
@spectrum-web-components/meter Patch
@spectrum-web-components/modal Patch
@spectrum-web-components/number-field Patch
@spectrum-web-components/overlay Patch
@spectrum-web-components/picker-button Patch
@spectrum-web-components/picker Patch
@spectrum-web-components/popover Patch
@spectrum-web-components/progress-circle Patch
@spectrum-web-components/radio Patch
@spectrum-web-components/search Patch
@spectrum-web-components/sidenav Patch
@spectrum-web-components/slider Patch
@spectrum-web-components/split-view Patch
@spectrum-web-components/status-light Patch
@spectrum-web-components/swatch Patch
@spectrum-web-components/switch Patch
@spectrum-web-components/table Patch
@spectrum-web-components/tabs Patch
@spectrum-web-components/tags Patch
@spectrum-web-components/textfield Patch
@spectrum-web-components/thumbnail Patch
@spectrum-web-components/toast Patch
@spectrum-web-components/tooltip Patch
@spectrum-web-components/top-nav Patch
@spectrum-web-components/tray Patch
@spectrum-web-components/underlay Patch
@spectrum-web-components/custom-vars-viewer Patch
@spectrum-web-components/story-decorator Patch
@spectrum-web-components/vrt-compare Patch
@spectrum-web-components/base Patch
@spectrum-web-components/grid Patch
@spectrum-web-components/opacity-checkerboard Patch
@spectrum-web-components/reactive-controllers Patch
@spectrum-web-components/shared Patch
@spectrum-web-components/styles Patch
@spectrum-web-components/theme Patch
@spectrum-web-components/truncated Patch
example-project-rollup Patch
example-project-webpack Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jun 18, 2025

Tachometer results

Chrome

progress-bar permalink

basic-test

Version Bytes Avg Time vs remote vs branch
npm latest 454 kB 29.44ms - 30.24ms - faster ✔
3% - 6%
0.77ms - 1.93ms
branch 432 kB 30.77ms - 31.61ms slower ❌
3% - 6%
0.77ms - 1.93ms
-
Firefox

progress-bar permalink

basic-test

Version Bytes Avg Time vs remote vs branch
npm latest 454 kB 59.85ms - 61.67ms - faster ✔
1% - 8%
0.74ms - 5.34ms
branch 432 kB 61.68ms - 65.92ms slower ❌
1% - 9%
0.74ms - 5.34ms
-

@cdransf cdransf marked this pull request as ready for review June 19, 2025 18:20
@cdransf cdransf requested a review from a team as a code owner June 19, 2025 18:20
@cdransf cdransf force-pushed the cdransf/progress-bar-docs-audit branch from b03e21f to d3066d2 Compare June 19, 2025 18:21
@cdransf cdransf added Documentation and removed WIP labels Jun 19, 2025
@cdransf cdransf requested review from nikkimk and caseyisonit June 19, 2025 18:21
@cdransf cdransf force-pushed the cdransf/progress-bar-docs-audit branch from 80b25dc to 67bd793 Compare June 19, 2025 23:39
@cdransf cdransf requested a review from Rajdeepc June 20, 2025 14:04
@cdransf cdransf force-pushed the cdransf/progress-bar-docs-audit branch from 6aab6d6 to cf28e9b Compare June 20, 2025 15:34
Copy link
Contributor

@Rajdeepc Rajdeepc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We already have a system in place to show deprecation notice like below. In package.json you can add deprecationNotice: " < your notice here> ".
I have pushed this commit for you to verify.

Screenshot 2025-06-23 at 4 37 02 PM

@cdransf
Copy link
Member Author

cdransf commented Jun 24, 2025

We already have a system in place to show deprecation notice like below. In package.json you can add deprecationNotice: " < your notice here> ". I have pushed this commit for you to verify.

Screenshot 2025-06-23 at 4 37 02 PM

Excellent, thank you! Do we need to address this? 03c57d2#r2161351158

Are all of the CSS changes expected in the diff as well?

@cdransf cdransf force-pushed the cdransf/progress-bar-docs-audit branch 2 times, most recently from 4a7e837 to 02018da Compare June 24, 2025 03:07
@Rajdeepc
Copy link
Contributor

We already have a system in place to show deprecation notice like below. In package.json you can add deprecationNotice: " < your notice here> ". I have pushed this commit for you to verify.
Screenshot 2025-06-23 at 4 37 02 PM

Excellent, thank you! Do we need to address this? 03c57d2#r2161351158

Are all of the CSS changes expected in the diff as well?

Mostly all are linting whitespace. Only change is

We already have a system in place to show deprecation notice like below. In package.json you can add deprecationNotice: " < your notice here> ". I have pushed this commit for you to verify.
Screenshot 2025-06-23 at 4 37 02 PM

Excellent, thank you! Do we need to address this? 03c57d2#r2161351158

Are all of the CSS changes expected in the diff as well?

@cdransf Yes we need to add the changes from this commit to maintain parity of UI on the deprecation notice. Let's not create another format here!

@cdransf cdransf force-pushed the cdransf/progress-bar-docs-audit branch 3 times, most recently from 03c57d2 to b17b435 Compare June 24, 2025 13:41
@cdransf
Copy link
Member Author

cdransf commented Jun 24, 2025

We already have a system in place to show deprecation notice like below. In package.json you can add deprecationNotice: " < your notice here> ". I have pushed this commit for you to verify.

Excellent, thank you! Do we need to address this? 03c57d2#r2161351158
Are all of the CSS changes expected in the diff as well?

Mostly all are linting whitespace. Only change is

We already have a system in place to show deprecation notice like below. In package.json you can add deprecationNotice: " < your notice here> ". I have pushed this commit for you to verify.

Excellent, thank you! Do we need to address this? 03c57d2#r2161351158
Are all of the CSS changes expected in the diff as well?

@cdransf Yes we need to add the changes from this commit to maintain parity of UI on the deprecation notice. Let's not create another format here!

Got it! I rebased main back in to resolve the conflicts when you have the time to take another look. ✨

@cdransf cdransf requested a review from Rajdeepc June 24, 2025 13:42
@Rajdeepc
Copy link
Contributor

We already have a system in place to show deprecation notice like below. In package.json you can add deprecationNotice: " < your notice here> ". I have pushed this commit for you to verify.

Excellent, thank you! Do we need to address this? 03c57d2#r2161351158
Are all of the CSS changes expected in the diff as well?

Mostly all are linting whitespace. Only change is

We already have a system in place to show deprecation notice like below. In package.json you can add deprecationNotice: " < your notice here> ". I have pushed this commit for you to verify.

Excellent, thank you! Do we need to address this? 03c57d2#r2161351158
Are all of the CSS changes expected in the diff as well?

@cdransf Yes we need to add the changes from this commit to maintain parity of UI on the deprecation notice. Let's not create another format here!

Got it! I rebased main back in to resolve the conflicts when you have the time to take another look. ✨

Can you add back inline-alert.css changes too. I think it is missing.

@cdransf
Copy link
Member Author

cdransf commented Jun 24, 2025

We already have a system in place to show deprecation notice like below. In package.json you can add deprecationNotice: " < your notice here> ". I have pushed this commit for you to verify.

Excellent, thank you! Do we need to address this? 03c57d2#r2161351158
Are all of the CSS changes expected in the diff as well?

Mostly all are linting whitespace. Only change is

We already have a system in place to show deprecation notice like below. In package.json you can add deprecationNotice: " < your notice here> ". I have pushed this commit for you to verify.

Excellent, thank you! Do we need to address this? 03c57d2#r2161351158
Are all of the CSS changes expected in the diff as well?

@cdransf Yes we need to add the changes from this commit to maintain parity of UI on the deprecation notice. Let's not create another format here!

Got it! I rebased main back in to resolve the conflicts when you have the time to take another look. ✨

Can you add back inline-alert.css changes too. I think it is missing.

Just restored those. ✨

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jun 25, 2025

📚 Branch Preview

🔍 Visual Regression Test Results

When a visual regression test fails (or has previously failed while working on this branch), its results can be found in the following URLs:

Deployed to Azure Blob Storage: pr-5553

If the changes are expected, update the current_golden_images_cache hash in the circleci config to accept the new images. Instructions are included in that file.
If the changes are unexpected, you can investigate the cause of the differences and update the code accordingly.

Copy link
Contributor

@nikkimk nikkimk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A few changes to some headings and wording but overall a welcome improvement to our docs.

@cdransf cdransf force-pushed the cdransf/progress-bar-docs-audit branch from ef5cb05 to cbef3bc Compare July 9, 2025 15:33
@cdransf cdransf requested a review from nikkimk July 9, 2025 15:36
@cdransf cdransf added ready-for-review ready-for-merge Will auto-update until merged labels Jul 9, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@Rajdeepc Rajdeepc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me! Please re-run the pipeline to clear out the VRT noise. If everything passes, this should be good to merge.

@cdransf cdransf force-pushed the cdransf/progress-bar-docs-audit branch from cbef3bc to d5ed278 Compare July 10, 2025 15:42
Copy link
Contributor

@nikkimk nikkimk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Lost gold treasure map (LGTM)

@adobe adobe deleted a comment from github-actions bot Jul 10, 2025
@cdransf cdransf force-pushed the cdransf/progress-bar-docs-audit branch from d5ed278 to b22d679 Compare July 10, 2025 17:28
@cdransf cdransf enabled auto-merge (squash) July 10, 2025 17:32
@cdransf cdransf force-pushed the cdransf/progress-bar-docs-audit branch 2 times, most recently from e9d1468 to 09e1e20 Compare July 10, 2025 17:40
@cdransf cdransf disabled auto-merge July 10, 2025 18:22
@cdransf cdransf force-pushed the cdransf/progress-bar-docs-audit branch from 09e1e20 to a4f9388 Compare July 11, 2025 16:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants