Skip to content

Conversation

@dohaki
Copy link
Contributor

@dohaki dohaki commented Jul 21, 2025

New MulticallHandler deployments:

  • Linea: 0xdF1C940487574EEfa79989a79a4936A0F979cDa2
  • zkSync: 0x68d3806E57148D6c6793C78EbDDbc272fE605dbf
  • Lens: 0x1Ed0D59019a52870337b51DEe8190486a8663037
  • HyperEVM: 0x5e7840e06faccb6d1c3b5f5e0d1d3d07f2829bba
  • Others: 0x0F7Ae28dE1C8532170AD4ee566B5801485c13a0E

Closes ACX-4208

@linear
Copy link

linear bot commented Jul 21, 2025

@dohaki dohaki force-pushed the spoke-pool-periphery-deployments branch from fdf4f71 to cc0810c Compare August 12, 2025 13:41
Base automatically changed from spoke-pool-periphery-deployments to master August 12, 2025 14:27
@dohaki dohaki force-pushed the new-multicall-handler-deployments branch from d247c69 to 868b901 Compare August 12, 2025 14:29
@dohaki dohaki marked this pull request as ready for review August 12, 2025 14:29
Copy link
Contributor

@pxrl pxrl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@dohaki Ideally we keep the deployment block numbers in sync, even though they're not strictly used by our implementations. I've updated them here; hopefully we can migrate the deployment scripts to foundry and start autopopulating them.

"SpokePool": { "address": "0x13fDac9F9b4777705db45291bbFF3c972c6d1d97", "blockNumber": 4240318 },
"SpokePoolVerifier": { "address": "0x3Fb9cED51E968594C87963a371Ed90c39519f65A", "blockNumber": 8669066 },
"MulticallHandler": { "address": "0x924a9f036260DdD5808007E1AA95f08eD08aA569", "blockNumber": 4112529 }
"MulticallHandler": { "address": "0x0F7Ae28dE1C8532170AD4ee566B5801485c13a0E", "blockNumber": 4112529 }
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We can delete Aleph Zero - the chain isn't up any longer and the RPCs are starting to disappear.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

dohaki and others added 11 commits September 16, 2025 12:26
Co-authored-by: Paul <108695806+pxrl@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Paul <108695806+pxrl@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Paul <108695806+pxrl@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Paul <108695806+pxrl@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Paul <108695806+pxrl@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Paul <108695806+pxrl@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Paul <108695806+pxrl@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Paul <108695806+pxrl@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Paul <108695806+pxrl@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Paul <108695806+pxrl@users.noreply.github.com>
@dohaki
Copy link
Contributor Author

dohaki commented Sep 16, 2025

@dohaki Ideally we keep the deployment block numbers in sync, even though they're not strictly used by our implementations. I've updated them here; hopefully we can migrate the deployment scripts to foundry and start autopopulating them.

Yes agree. Thanks for looking them up! Should be updated now

@dohaki dohaki requested a review from pxrl September 16, 2025 10:46
@dohaki dohaki merged commit 64b5706 into master Sep 16, 2025
10 checks passed
@dohaki dohaki deleted the new-multicall-handler-deployments branch September 16, 2025 14:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants