Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Using Poetry instead of requirements #61

Closed
fakeid30 opened this issue Nov 6, 2020 · 2 comments
Closed

Using Poetry instead of requirements #61

fakeid30 opened this issue Nov 6, 2020 · 2 comments
Labels
low priority issue issue that are valid but not important enough question Further information is requested

Comments

@fakeid30
Copy link
Collaborator

fakeid30 commented Nov 6, 2020

What do you think about that? @cullzie @aapatre @ethankrein

https://python-poetry.org/

@fakeid30 fakeid30 added low priority issue issue that are valid but not important enough question Further information is requested labels Nov 6, 2020
@cullzie
Copy link
Collaborator

cullzie commented Nov 6, 2020

@fakeid30 I usually use pipenv in projects I'm working on. Haven't used poetry but it seems to offer similar functionality.
It just boils down to personal preferences at the end of the day.
I'm all for adding something more functional for dev than requirements though 👍

@fakeid30
Copy link
Collaborator Author

fakeid30 commented Nov 6, 2020

@cullzie In my arch linux I still face this issue : pypa/pipenv#2681 , so I've went ahead and added Poetry .

Invoking poetry install in the project directory should setup the environment now.

@fakeid30 fakeid30 closed this as completed Nov 6, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
low priority issue issue that are valid but not important enough question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants