Skip to content

simple dive into rootless Docker, with the most bestest programming language ever

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings

Zeebrow/rootless-docker-flask

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

10 Commits
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

Rootless Docker with Flask

"Rootless" immediately sounds great. Safety! Ownership! In case you're just joining, far too many Docker pages lack clarity and/or depth outside of the immediate usecases you're there searching for. (How could they? It's only a cross-platform container runtime that needs to support workloads of the likes of Kubernetes, up until recently) I want more details than what the Docker docs provide, in this case.

So here I threw up a little Flask api app (read: "Hello World++") that provides some info on what's going on under the hood of a rootless-Docker install.

I did learn a few interesting details about the daemon, but also about what it might mean to migrate a containerized app that was written under the assumption that container's runtime has root access.

background

Rootless-Docker is a more secure way to run the Docker daemon.

This is done after setting up rootless-docker on my Ubuntu host.

I already head the rooty tooty Docker installed, along with a Kubernetes cluster running. HAd I been hosting anything of value, well, let's just say I wouldn't have been able to rush this out to build on like I've done.

I wrote this taking for granted that rootless-Docker is installed and configured per the docs. Test for yourself with cat /run/user/$(id -u)/docker.pid

usage

`./rebuild [user to run as]`

or

git clone https://github.com/Zeebrow/rootless-docker-flask
cd rootless-docker-flask
docker build -t local/rootless-flask .
docker run -d --rm --name rootless-flask -p5000:5000 local/rootless-flask
curl localhost:5000/sysinfo # gets some info from inside the container

This will show "user-getpass": "appuser" as defined in the Dockerfile on success.

Notes

Setting users when standing up a container

-u only works if the user exists inside the container. If the Dockerfile didn't have the first RUN directive, things would seems to work swimmingly - but Python would call os.getpass.getuser() and shit the bed, with something like "No user found for uid 1001" (or whatever was set with USER).

You can always pass -u root to docker run for the container to behave like a more-familiar root container. Not sure yet how different a "rootless root" user in a container is. Me thinks a lot not gonna work, man.

docker rm -f local/rootless-flask
docker run -d --rm --name rootless-flask -p5000:5000 -u root local/rootless-flask

Either the term "rootless" is misleading, or I'm doing something wrong here.

Read/write access to bind mounts is determined by Docker host's file permissions

Not to be confused with "the Docker host's file ownership".

This must be a result of how newuidmap and newgidmap programs work (they're dependencies for rootless Docker). The man pages for these are really short.

Basically, it seems that if you want to write to files on a bind mount from inside a container, the permissions need to be set appropriately on the host. Which kind of makes sense. I dunno if this is the same for rooty Docker (I need to spin up a VM and try this out... sometime).

This holds even if the container user exists on the Docker host, and has the same $(id) in and outside of the container.

Yup, still true if you passed -u root with docker run. Only difference is you can frolic about in the container more freely. So if you're doing containers right, this makes no difference.

So far, so neat.

Thoughts

124MB image size = yikes

A multi-stage build could bring the image size down. I wonder how big a footprint the Golang equivalent would be - that'd be a fun Saturday!

It would be neet to be able to configure the response as the container is running

Totally unrelated to rootless docker. I wanted to think through a potential design pattern that is close to similar api projects I've written in the past.

Say for example you build the container, with your Python app importing json,os,sys, etc.

Add a custom Flask route, say, /myconfig. It returns jsonify(json.load(fd)), where fd is a your open() config file on the docker host. This file would look something like:

{
  "whatever you want": sys.path,
  "another thing you want": os.getenv('foo')
}

Under the hood, Python would use exec() to run the code*. Quick n dirty:

@app.route('/myconfig')
def myconfig(maybe_query_string_here=None):
  with open('config_filepath.json', 'r') as cfg:
    j = json.load(cfg)
  for your_key, your_value in j.items():
    rtn[your_key] = exec(your_value)
  return Jsonify(rtn)

then you can curl localhost:5000/myconfig to see how various Python modules behave in a container.

Theoretically, you've got the Python interpreter at your disposal here, along with whatever packages you installed. And you can't really f anything up for anyone but yourself, because you're in a rootless container.

*Obviously, Terms and Conditions apply. See store for details

More info

Great in-depth guide to rootlessness (That I need to finish reading)

USER Dockerfile directive

rootless-docker

About

simple dive into rootless Docker, with the most bestest programming language ever

Topics

Resources

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

No packages published