Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

upgrade tx pool #533

Merged
merged 18 commits into from
May 14, 2024
Merged

upgrade tx pool #533

merged 18 commits into from
May 14, 2024

Conversation

gzliudan
Copy link
Collaborator

@gzliudan gzliudan commented May 11, 2024

Proposed changes

Pick below PRs for EIP-1559:

Types of changes

What types of changes does your code introduce to XDC network?
Put an in the boxes that apply

  • Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • Documentation Update (if none of the other choices apply)
  • Regular KTLO or any of the maintaince work. e.g code style
  • CICD Improvement

Impacted Components

Which part of the codebase this PR will touch base on,

Put an in the boxes that apply

  • Consensus
  • Account
  • Network
  • Geth
  • Smart Contract
  • External components
  • Not sure (Please specify below)

Checklist

Put an in the boxes once you have confirmed below actions (or provide reasons on not doing so) that

  • This PR has sufficient test coverage (unit/integration test) OR I have provided reason in the PR description for not having test coverage
  • Provide an end-to-end test plan in the PR description on how to manually test it on the devnet/testnet.
  • Tested the backwards compatibility.
  • Tested with XDC nodes running this version co-exist with those running the previous version.
  • Relevant documentation has been updated as part of this PR
  • N/A
  • - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ] - [ ]

gzliudan and others added 15 commits May 13, 2024 22:07
* txpool: smaller lock portion

* core/tx_pool: fix data race
…ereum#21170)

Once we detect an invalid transaction during recovering signatures, we should
directly exclude this transaction to avoid validating the signatures hereafter.

This should optimize the validations times of transactions with invalid signatures
to only one time.
* core: added local tx pool test case

* core, crypto: various allocation savings regarding tx handling

* core/txlist, txpool: save a reheap operation, avoid some bigint allocs

Co-authored-by: Marius van der Wijden <m.vanderwijden@live.de>
* core: avoid modification of accountSet cache in tx_pool

when runReorg, we may copy the dirtyAccounts' accountSet cache to promoteAddrs
in which accounts will be promoted, however, if we have reset request at the
same time, we may reuse promoteAddrs and modify the cache content which is
against the original intention of accountSet cache. So, we need to make a new
slice here to avoid modify accountSet cache.

* core: fix flatten condition + comment

Co-authored-by: Felix Lange <fjl@twurst.com>
holiman and others added 3 commits May 14, 2024 10:09
…um#21478)

* core: separate the local notion from the pricedHeap

* core: add benchmarks

* core: improve tests

* core: address comments

* core: degrade the panic to error message

* core: fix typo

* core: address comments

* core: address comment

* core: use PEAK instead of POP

* core: address comments
fixes an issue where local transactions that were included in the chain before a SetHead were rejected if resubmitted, since the txpool had not reset the state to the current (older) state.
@wanwiset25
Copy link
Collaborator

I approved but status didn't change
Screenshot 2024-05-14 at 16 33 02

@gzliudan gzliudan merged commit 8973e73 into XinFinOrg:dev-upgrade May 14, 2024
17 checks passed
@gzliudan gzliudan deleted the tx-pool branch May 14, 2024 15:14
@gzliudan gzliudan mentioned this pull request May 17, 2024
19 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

10 participants