-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 801
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
V7 Series Release! #1593
Comments
It will also be great to get proposals about what issues should be included in V7 milestone. |
@carlosrecuero @unaizorrilla I looked through all the open PRs and asked their authors to update them pulling changes from master. Some of PRs have already passed review. Help in UI/docker/K8s stuff is appreciated. |
All 7.0.0-preview packages have been published. Example - https://www.nuget.org/packages/AspNetCore.HealthChecks.UI/7.0.0-rc2.6 |
Are you gonna to upgrade version of |
Any ETA for this one? |
Nope. I'm not the "core repo maintainer" and I'm still waiting feedback. @carlosrecuero @CarlosLanderas and @unaizorrilla are. Honestly, I have not received feedback from them for that repo for a very long time. Techically I can make a release at any time - it's just 2 clicks to set Why didn't I make a release yet? See pain points in my initial comment. I do not use 100% of this repo. Actually I even do not know how it works, I have never tried to start UI bits, open dashboards, dive into databases integration, etc. I don’t know if everything works there after the changes made. |
Rel: #1714 |
I’m trying to find some time to get up de UI next week… You can release v7 package for health checks, no the UI? |
Thanks. I configured CI in such a way that we can publish packages one by one or all packages in the same time. I would just wait. |
Also please pay attention to #1712. |
Could we start realeasing V7 versions of the packages that don't have an issue? |
What issue? |
I'm referring to the "pain points" you mentioned in a previous comment and also if there are any issues (tasks) preventing packages from being released.
Then regarding to @unaizorrilla's comment:
And your response:
Given above; could we start realeasing V7 versions of the packages that don't have an issue? |
Technically yes, but I think it will raise questions from consumers rather quickly if they find themselves with mix from v7 and v6 packages. I'm 50/50 here honestly. |
Hi all. Since the lack of feedback from core repo maintainers for more than 6 months I'll publish v7 release in coming days (despite the aforementioned problems) after I see the accumulated mail. The plan is to solve problems with v7 release as they appear. |
Heads up! For all devs interested in v7 - if you have proposals for making changes to v7, now it's time to say about it or/and post PRs / revive existing ones, because after the release I will not be inclined to make backward incompatible changes for some (potentially long) time. I think that in the absence of significant proposals, the release will be published at the end of this week. |
@cieciurm I added "needs confirmation" label on 3 more PRs. Also you can look into other PRs mentioned above. |
I can look into those 3 labeled next week - I can't promise more (this week I was able to work on 3 as well). So the ETA is next Friday 14th of July :) |
I can see a progress in terms of closing hanging PR-s 🎉 ! I see we have just a couple of them left. @sungam3r what is your opinion on the next steps before V7 release? Should we try to close all from the list you have pasted above? We also have 9 issues labeled as "Up for grabs", but not sure if we wanna extend the scope? |
I use up-for-grabs tag for easy tasks (easy in my opinion) so anyone can accomplish them. I would like to deal with all issues from my comment above and not interfere with up-for-grabs issues. But I'm fine to go another way and try to deal with those 9 issues. Of course at the cost of additional time. I have no much time these days because of household chores. |
Also #1869 |
Issues left |
I see that you have the first one covered (PR in-progress). So - almost there 🎉 🎊 😄 |
Anyone, help with #1716 is appreciated. |
I want to briefly sort out pending issues before v7 release, 93 left. |
Also I decided skip #1660 and handle it later. |
Pending:
@cieciurm You may take case of #1943 if you want.
Done. I think we are ready to release v7 after merging aforementioned 2 PRs. |
Because you've pinged the original author in the PR, let's wait until end of Tuesday (August 1st). If it's not adjusted, I'll do it myself |
Thanks to all participants! |
Could you highlight the breaking changes (assuming there are some since the major version was bumped)? I need to make sure I can safely update, and searching the lists above for "breaking" did not give any relevant results. |
The major version was bumped to stay consistent with dotnet versioning, there have been no breaking changes to my knowledge. That being said, if you're using dotnet 6 I recommend waiting for #1980 to be merged, before you update to v7 |
Thanks for the clarification! Using .NET 7, so I'll go ahead and update. |
So far all projects and CI/CD pipelines have been updated to use the latest-and-greatest .NET7. A lot of dependencies were changed to the latest versions, i.e. bumping major versions.
Pain points:
dotnet test
For now we can release preview versions of all packages listed in that repo and collect feedback.
This issue is pinned to take addition attention from community. ping @carlosrecuero @unaizorrilla
Comments are appreciated!
UPDATED:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: