You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
If you haven't already seen this, Node.js has begun including their own built-in support for sqlite via "node:sqlite". Should we update the benchmark table to include data from this builtin?
Writing a bit of probably terrible code to make the benchmark work. It seems to be a lot better than node-sqlite3, but not quite as good as better-sqlite3. I'm sure some of the performance is lost due to the package being new and untested (and my terrible code). But otherwise it seems at least worth mentioning.
The biggest and most obvious downside is the requirement for the --experimental-sqlite flag. But it's 'already' at Stability 1.1. We'll see if it ever moves to 1.2 or 2.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
LqdBcnAtWork
changed the title
node:sqlite and benchmarkingnode:sqlite and benchmarking
Sep 25, 2024
If you haven't already seen this, Node.js has begun including their own built-in support for sqlite via "node:sqlite". Should we update the benchmark table to include data from this builtin?
Writing a bit of probably terrible code to make the benchmark work. It seems to be a lot better than
node-sqlite3
, but not quite as good asbetter-sqlite3
. I'm sure some of the performance is lost due to the package being new and untested (and my terrible code). But otherwise it seems at least worth mentioning.The biggest and most obvious downside is the requirement for the
--experimental-sqlite
flag. But it's 'already' at Stability 1.1. We'll see if it ever moves to 1.2 or 2.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: