Skip to content

[EH][test] Slice test code into different functions #6177

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 13, 2023

Conversation

aheejin
Copy link
Member

@aheejin aheejin commented Dec 13, 2023

We ported basic tests to test/lit/basic/ in #6160, but comparing CHECK lines with the test code for long functions is not easy, even though it wouldn't necessarily be worse than the the separate files we used to have in test/. This slices exception-handling.wast into functions so that the CHECK lines are easy to check.

We ported basic tests to `test/lit/basic/` in WebAssembly#6160, but comparing
`CHECK` lines with the test code for long functions is not easy, even
though it wouldn't necessarily be worse than the the separate files we
used to have in `test/`. This slices `exception-handling.wast` into
functions so that the `CHECK` lines are easy to check.
@aheejin aheejin requested a review from tlively December 13, 2023 18:55
@aheejin aheejin merged commit 1da1363 into WebAssembly:main Dec 13, 2023
@aheejin aheejin deleted the slice_eh_test branch December 13, 2023 19:55
radekdoulik pushed a commit to dotnet/binaryen that referenced this pull request Jul 12, 2024
We ported basic tests to `test/lit/basic/` in WebAssembly#6160, but comparing
`CHECK` lines with the test code for long functions is not easy, even
though it wouldn't necessarily be worse than the the separate files we
used to have in `test/`. This slices `exception-handling.wast` into
functions so that the `CHECK` lines are easy to check.
@gkdn gkdn mentioned this pull request Aug 31, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants