Skip to content

Make check_starting_point of test_move launch files configurable #1354

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 6, 2025

Conversation

urfeex
Copy link
Member

@urfeex urfeex commented May 5, 2025

This should allow to use them in situations, where the robot is not at the preconfigured pose, but users understand the risks and want to circumvent this.

Also, I updated the documentation around this.

@urfeex urfeex requested a review from a team May 5, 2025 07:15
@urfeex
Copy link
Member Author

urfeex commented May 5, 2025

This recently came up in #1349

Copy link

codecov bot commented May 5, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 5.07%. Comparing base (1b121b7) to head (7bc1ddb).
Report is 432 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##            main   #1354      +/-   ##
========================================
+ Coverage   3.59%   5.07%   +1.48%     
========================================
  Files         13      33      +20     
  Lines        947    3430    +2483     
  Branches     152     421     +269     
========================================
+ Hits          34     174     +140     
- Misses       843    3254    +2411     
+ Partials      70       2      -68     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 5.07% <ø> (+1.48%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

This should allow to use them in situations, where the robot is not at
the preconfigured pose, but users understand the risks and want to
circumvent this.

Also, I updated the documentation around this.
@urfeex urfeex force-pushed the improve_test_launches branch from 2d06cde to 7bc1ddb Compare May 5, 2025 07:32
@urfeex urfeex merged commit 02ee718 into UniversalRobots:main May 6, 2025
9 of 12 checks passed
@urfeex urfeex deleted the improve_test_launches branch May 6, 2025 14:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants