Skip to content

Allow an empty input recipe to the RTDE client #318

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

urfeex
Copy link
Member

@urfeex urfeex commented May 6, 2025

This PR aims at providing the option to use an RTDE client READ-ONLY by providing an empty input recipe.

At this stage it is only an attempt to play around with that possibility, implementation details may change significantly.

Copy link

codecov bot commented May 6, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 33.33333% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 76.06%. Comparing base (99ac21d) to head (5d0ac76).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/rtde/rtde_client.cpp 33.33% 1 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #318      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   76.22%   76.06%   -0.17%     
==========================================
  Files          87       87              
  Lines        3739     3739              
  Branches      414      415       +1     
==========================================
- Hits         2850     2844       -6     
- Misses        672      677       +5     
- Partials      217      218       +1     
Flag Coverage Δ
start_ursim 81.30% <ø> (-1.03%) ⬇️
ur20-latest 73.89% <33.33%> (-0.05%) ⬇️
ur5-3.14.3 74.50% <33.33%> (-0.10%) ⬇️
ur5e-10.7.0 68.59% <33.33%> (-0.04%) ⬇️
ur5e-5.9.4 74.36% <33.33%> (-0.10%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant