-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 450
refactor!: introduce NetVar.ValueRef & convert NetTrans.NetState to struct #1061
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ namespace Unity.Netcode.Prototyping | |||
[AddComponentMenu("Netcode/" + nameof(NetworkTransform))] | |||
public class NetworkTransform : NetworkBehaviour | |||
{ | |||
internal class NetworkState : INetworkSerializable | |||
internal struct NetworkState : INetworkSerializable |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I wanted to see what it'd mean to convert from class
to struct
(turns out, it's not too bad :P)
/// <summary> | ||
/// The temporary accessor to enable struct element access until [MTT-1020] complete | ||
/// </summary> | ||
public ref T ValueRef | ||
{ | ||
get => ref m_InternalValue; | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this part is introduced by PR #1051 originally, it's here too.
I'm not sure about the ultimate API, @mattwalsh-unity might chime in here as he wants to drive this change/shift around the codebase.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is commented temporary, granted, but I'm not familiar with the linked issue. Can you elaborate on why marking the netvar dirty is not needed here ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not entirely sure what is the new design direction but I can tell you why NetworkTransform's State still works: we manually mark NetVar to be dirty later in code. So, we don't rely on a get/set prop marking NetVar dirty, we mark the NetVar dirty somewhere else.
struct
Yeah, I may be messing with the ValueRef stuff more but this looks good and I'd love to have this on mainline and rebase off of it |
…nsform * develop: (21 commits) test: adding more details to multiprocess readme (#1050) refactor!: convert NetworkTransform.NetworkState to `struct` (#1061) fix: networkmanager destroy on app quit (#1011) feat: snapshot, using unreliable packets, now that the underlying foundation supports it. Only merge after #1062 (#1064) feat: snapshot. Fully integrated despawn, mtt-1092, mtt-1056 (#1062) fix: eliminate bad use-after-free(destroy) pattern (#1068) chore: cleanup meta files for empty dirs (#1067) chore: minor MLAPI to Netcode rename (#1065) feat: report network behaviour name to the profiler (#1058) fix: player movement (#1063) test: Add unit tests for NetworkTime properties (#1053) chore: remove authority & netvar perms from NetworkTransform (#1059) feat: networktransform pos/rot/sca thresholds on state sync (#1055) feat: expose network behaviour type name internally (#1057) chore: remove all the old profiling code (#1048) fix: if-guard `NetworkManager.__rpc_name_table` access (#1056) fix: Disabling fixedupdate portion of SpawnRpcDespawn test because it's failing for known reasons that will be fixed in the IMessage refactor. (#1049) feat: Implement metrics for the new network profiler (#960) chore!: change package name & asmdefs (#1026) feat: per axis networktransform state sync (+bitwise state comp) (#1042) ... # Conflicts: # com.unity.netcode.gameobjects/Prototyping/NetworkTransform.cs
decoupling from PR #1051