Skip to content

Feature/initial relay utp remove relay sdk calls #1032

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

thoward-unity
Copy link
Contributor

…ow accepts a variable passed in via a setter method. Also updated the sample test project included to illustrate these changes.
…tructured the manner that code external to UTPTransport passes in the requisite relay server data so that external code doesn't need to know about the internal data structures that UTPTransport uses.
@thoward-unity thoward-unity merged commit ccbf652 into feature/initial-relay-utp Aug 9, 2021
@thoward-unity thoward-unity deleted the feature/initial-relay-utp-remove-relay-sdk-calls branch August 9, 2021 18:25
thoward-unity added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 9, 2021
thoward-unity added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 9, 2021
thoward-unity added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 10, 2021
thoward-unity added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 10, 2021
* DST-528: Extracted Relay SDK calls out of UTP adapter for MLAPI; it now accepts a variable passed in via a setter method. Also updated the sample test project included to illustrate these changes.

* DST-528: Made some changes that address feedback comments; mainly restructured the manner that code external to UTPTransport passes in the requisite relay server data so that external code doesn't need to know about the internal data structures that UTPTransport uses.

* DST-528: Removing minor changes that were erroneously left in when taking other approaches.

* DST-528: Addressing minor code review changes.

* Revert "Revert "Feature/initial relay utp remove relay sdk calls (#1032)" (#1033)"

This reverts commit cd54529.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant