Skip to content

dtim/strings redesign (draft for CI) #603

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

Conversation

dtim
Copy link
Collaborator

@dtim dtim commented Jul 28, 2022

Description

A draft PR to run CI actions. Failures are expected (especially as concrete execution is turned off in UtSettings).

Fixes # (issue)

Type of Change

  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)

How Has This Been Tested?

Automated Testing

Specify tests that help to verify the change automatically.

Example: org.utbot.examples.algorithms.BinarySearchTest

Manual Scenario

Please, provide several scenarios that you went through to verify that the change worked as expected.

Checklist (remove irrelevant options):

This is the author self-check list

  • The change followed the style guidelines of the UTBot project
  • Self-review of the code is passed
  • The change contains enough commentaries, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • New documentation is provided or existed one is altered
  • No new warnings
  • New tests have been added
  • All tests pass locally with my changes

@dtim dtim force-pushed the dtim/strings_redesign branch 2 times, most recently from 5716885 to 32751b0 Compare August 3, 2022 12:14
@dtim dtim force-pushed the dtim/strings_redesign branch 5 times, most recently from fc850dc to cd44668 Compare September 1, 2022 10:59
@dtim dtim force-pushed the dtim/strings_redesign branch from cd44668 to 2eb1f24 Compare September 11, 2022 06:52
@korifey
Copy link
Contributor

korifey commented Sep 11, 2022

Cool! Lets remove Z3 strings eventually

@dtim dtim force-pushed the dtim/strings_redesign branch from f484cba to bd9b77c Compare September 24, 2022 15:27
  * Removed `UtNativeString`, `NativeStringWrapper`, string-related
    `UtExpression` subclasses
  * Implemented `toString` methods for numeric wrappers in Java
  * Restored temporarily disabled `testByteToString` test

  Complex `GenericExamples` string tests are disabled until symbolic
  part of the wrapper is enabled.

  TODO: `StringWrapper` may still produce irrelevant constraints.
@dtim dtim force-pushed the dtim/strings_redesign branch from cb452f4 to 7a22212 Compare September 28, 2022 09:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants