Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Wrong filament used calculation? #906

Closed
Protoncek opened this issue Aug 14, 2020 · 4 comments · Fixed by #1082
Closed

Wrong filament used calculation? #906

Protoncek opened this issue Aug 14, 2020 · 4 comments · Fixed by #1082
Assignees
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@Protoncek
Copy link

I'm not sure if this is OctoDash's error, but i have "a problem": does anyone of you noticed: "filament used" is different on OctoDash than the one in PrusaSlicer. Example: a small hook, in Slicer says filament used 4,36g, while in OctoDash file info says 13.7g. Where to look for error?

Thanks!

@Protoncek Protoncek added the support Something isn't working with the users setup label Aug 14, 2020
@UnchartedBull
Copy link
Owner

That could very well be an OctoDash error. The filament calculation seems to be kind of flaky. I'll need to rewrite that part, will be included in one of the next versions.

@UnchartedBull UnchartedBull added bug Something isn't working and removed support Something isn't working with the users setup labels Aug 18, 2020
@TylerHannis
Copy link

I'm having the same issue. Cura quotes at 19g, but display says 55.9g. Its pretty consistently off by a factor of just below 3.

@UnchartedBull UnchartedBull self-assigned this Sep 15, 2020
@robwasteground
Copy link

robwasteground commented Sep 16, 2020

Same issue here, Cura (and OctoPrint) show what seems to be correct length (5g, 1.72m), OctoDash shows 15.3g. It always seems to be off by a factor of somewhere around ~3 here as well (edit: happy to help with any testing that helps take care of this!)

@UnchartedBull
Copy link
Owner

Ok this was a really weird error. OctoPrint seems to be reporting the wrong filament volume (should be 2.5something in the screenshot), this then offsets OctoDash. Don't really know why the amount is still correct then. I'll revert back to calculate everything on my own from filament length, which should hopefully fix the problem.

image

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants