-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use the latest ReverseDiff #97
Conversation
There is an issue with the latest ReverseDiff version. I am on it. |
CC: @ChrisRackauckas |
I'm also seeing something a bit odd: https://travis-ci.org/github/SciML/DiffEqFlux.jl/jobs/709405023 |
Almost fixed it locally. |
Once tests pass locally, I will push the fixes. |
No worries, thanks for being on it. Out of curiosity, what aspect does it seem to be pointing to? |
It was a name clash mostly. I defined |
The remaining failures are ambiguity errors when constructing |
I fixed all the errors locally. Once JuliaStats/Distributions.jl#1148 gets merged and released, I will push the fixes. If the Distributions.jl maintainers don't like the PR, I will workaround it by defining |
We should rebase the changes in #95 before merging this PR. |
Fair enough. |
I fixed some merge conflicts arising from recent changes in the master branch. Hopefully I didn't mess up anything 🤞 |
Anything else that you want to include in this PR @mohamed82008? |
LGTM, thanks @devmotion! |
The latest version of ReverseDiff (JuliaRegistries/General#18125) has a lot of the functionality in DistributionsAD. This PR removes the code already ported to RD and sets a lower bound on RD's version. Tests should pass after the RD PR is merged.