-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1k
ESM-only builds #3064
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Draft
mfedderly
wants to merge
13
commits into
master
Choose a base branch
from
mf/esm-only
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Draft
ESM-only builds #3064
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
13 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
8f209f9
Move to tsc builds and esm only
mfedderly 936af01
[auto] apply monorepolint
mfedderly fa8777c
Fix @turf/boolean-crosses logic with lines that touch/cross an end ve…
mfedderly ee8716e
Modify the tsconfig.shared.json a bit
mfedderly 8282d58
[auto] remove tslib using monorepolint
mfedderly eaee094
skipLibCheck -> false
mfedderly 7c75bee
Update last-checks tests
mfedderly 55aef48
Rework exports entries to work from cjs
mfedderly 9ed64b4
[auto] apply monorepolint
mfedderly 56f68d3
fix turf last-checks testing for new exports structure
mfedderly cafaa84
Update CI Node targets
mfedderly 7876752
Increase tsconfig strictness
mfedderly fa6e109
Ban top-level await for node compat
mfedderly File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
escheck-cjs is no longer necessary because we're dropping cjs builds in this PR.
escheck-web is only necessary if you don't trust the Rollup step to output valid syntax. It has caught some things in the past where newer rollups ship
catch{}syntax which isn't es5, but we're also going to move this way forward to es2022 or similar with Turf@8.escheck-esm is no longer necessary and we are instead protected by tsconfig.shared.json's
targetof es2022 (in this PR). TypeScript will prevent us from using syntax that isn't supported at this version (which aligns with the tsconfig suggestions for node 22.