You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Great question, and thanks for your interest in our work!
The most straightforward way to handle inequality constraints would probably be a penalty method where the cost is augmented with a constraint violation term. The solver doesn't currently support this out-of-the-box, since we focused on the simplest possible case to optimize performance.
Updating the solver to support such penalties shouldn't be too difficult, but right now I don't have much time to work on it myself. If this is something you are interested in implementing we'd definitely welcome a contribution! We do have an (outdated, untested) prototype of joint and collision constraints in #18 that could be a good starting point.
Recently I readed this paper,I found there only handle equality contraint(dynamics),what can i do if i want to handle collision or joint limit?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: