Adding in the evaluate postfix notation using Stack#2598
Merged
cclauss merged 12 commits intoTheAlgorithms:masterfrom Oct 16, 2020
Merged
Adding in the evaluate postfix notation using Stack#2598cclauss merged 12 commits intoTheAlgorithms:masterfrom
cclauss merged 12 commits intoTheAlgorithms:masterfrom
Conversation
Adding in the evaluate postfix notation using Stacks one of the common use with simple stack question creating a new file for the data structure of stacks
Adding in the evaluate postfix notation using Stacks one of the common use with simple stack question creating a new file for the data structure of stacks
Member
|
Please change the PR's title to something more meaningful. |
Sending in the PR again as the Previous request failed in pre commit
Made changes as per the required for fixing the failing pre-commits.
cclauss
reviewed
Oct 15, 2020
| @@ -1,12 +1,24 @@ | |||
| ''' | |||
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is called a docstring which explains the intent of this file. The docstring is used by pydoc if you run the command python3 -m pydoc data_structures/stacks/evaluate_postfix_notations.py
By converting this to a comment, this PR would remove that documentation.
cclauss
reviewed
Oct 15, 2020
cclauss
reviewed
Oct 15, 2020
Member
|
https://docs.python.org/3/library/operator.html makes dealing with these probems much easier. |
cclauss
reviewed
Oct 15, 2020
Made changes as suggested by @cclauss
Contributor
Author
|
thanks, @cclauss for the detailed review. However, pre commits are still failing. I'll update and recommit |
fixed pre-commit fails
fixing pre-commit fails
cclauss
reviewed
Oct 16, 2020
Deleted trailing white spaces causing pre-commits to fail
cclauss
reviewed
Oct 16, 2020
cclauss
reviewed
Oct 16, 2020
Co-authored-by: Christian Clauss <cclauss@me.com>
Co-authored-by: Christian Clauss <cclauss@me.com>
Contributor
Author
|
@cclauss sir is there something else that needs to be fixed in this? |
cclauss
approved these changes
Oct 16, 2020
stokhos
pushed a commit
to stokhos/Python
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 3, 2021
* Create evaluate_postfix_notations.py Adding in the evaluate postfix notation using Stacks one of the common use with simple stack question creating a new file for the data structure of stacks * Create evaluate_postfix_notations.py Adding in the evaluate postfix notation using Stacks one of the common use with simple stack question creating a new file for the data structure of stacks * Delete evaluate_postfix_notations.py * Evaluate postfix expression stack clean approach Sending in the PR again as the Previous request failed in pre commit * Update evaluate_postfix_notations.py * Update evaluate_postfix_notations.py Made changes as per the required for fixing the failing pre-commits. * Update evaluate_postfix_notations.py Made changes as suggested by @cclauss * Update evaluate_postfix_notations.py fixed pre-commit fails * Update evaluate_postfix_notations.py fixing pre-commit fails * Update evaluate_postfix_notations.py Deleted trailing white spaces causing pre-commits to fail * Update data_structures/stacks/evaluate_postfix_notations.py Co-authored-by: Christian Clauss <cclauss@me.com> * Update data_structures/stacks/evaluate_postfix_notations.py Co-authored-by: Christian Clauss <cclauss@me.com> Co-authored-by: Christian Clauss <cclauss@me.com>
peRFectBeliever
pushed a commit
to peRFectBeliever/Python
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 1, 2021
* Create evaluate_postfix_notations.py Adding in the evaluate postfix notation using Stacks one of the common use with simple stack question creating a new file for the data structure of stacks * Create evaluate_postfix_notations.py Adding in the evaluate postfix notation using Stacks one of the common use with simple stack question creating a new file for the data structure of stacks * Delete evaluate_postfix_notations.py * Evaluate postfix expression stack clean approach Sending in the PR again as the Previous request failed in pre commit * Update evaluate_postfix_notations.py * Update evaluate_postfix_notations.py Made changes as per the required for fixing the failing pre-commits. * Update evaluate_postfix_notations.py Made changes as suggested by @cclauss * Update evaluate_postfix_notations.py fixed pre-commit fails * Update evaluate_postfix_notations.py fixing pre-commit fails * Update evaluate_postfix_notations.py Deleted trailing white spaces causing pre-commits to fail * Update data_structures/stacks/evaluate_postfix_notations.py Co-authored-by: Christian Clauss <cclauss@me.com> * Update data_structures/stacks/evaluate_postfix_notations.py Co-authored-by: Christian Clauss <cclauss@me.com> Co-authored-by: Christian Clauss <cclauss@me.com>
Panquesito7
pushed a commit
to Panquesito7/Python
that referenced
this pull request
May 13, 2021
* Create evaluate_postfix_notations.py Adding in the evaluate postfix notation using Stacks one of the common use with simple stack question creating a new file for the data structure of stacks * Create evaluate_postfix_notations.py Adding in the evaluate postfix notation using Stacks one of the common use with simple stack question creating a new file for the data structure of stacks * Delete evaluate_postfix_notations.py * Evaluate postfix expression stack clean approach Sending in the PR again as the Previous request failed in pre commit * Update evaluate_postfix_notations.py * Update evaluate_postfix_notations.py Made changes as per the required for fixing the failing pre-commits. * Update evaluate_postfix_notations.py Made changes as suggested by @cclauss * Update evaluate_postfix_notations.py fixed pre-commit fails * Update evaluate_postfix_notations.py fixing pre-commit fails * Update evaluate_postfix_notations.py Deleted trailing white spaces causing pre-commits to fail * Update data_structures/stacks/evaluate_postfix_notations.py Co-authored-by: Christian Clauss <cclauss@me.com> * Update data_structures/stacks/evaluate_postfix_notations.py Co-authored-by: Christian Clauss <cclauss@me.com> Co-authored-by: Christian Clauss <cclauss@me.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Describe your change:
Adding in the evaluate postfix notation using Stacks
one of the common use with simple stack question
creating a new file for the data structure of stacks
Checklist:
Fixes: #{$ISSUE_NO}.