You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
From the introductory material, "A Quick Explanation and Example of GVF Content", under "attributes:Variant_seq":
@ (at): An alias for the sequence found in the Reference_seq attribute.
Other options include: ., -, ~, !, and ^.
The full 'Variant_seq' section, where this required term is defined, reads:
In addition to the observed nucleic acid sequence, several other characters (.-~@!^) are valid values in the Variant_seq attribute. Use of these characters is described below with examples.
However the '@' option is not defined in the examples along with the other characters.
Possibly related: '@' is not accepted as a valid entry for 'Variant_seq' by the current gvf_validator.pl script.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@keilbeck@thefferon I think we can drop support for '@'. I don't think it was ever adopted by either our tools or others. If there is no disagreement I'll remove it.
From the introductory material, "A Quick Explanation and Example of GVF Content", under "attributes:Variant_seq":
Other options include: ., -, ~, !, and ^.
The full 'Variant_seq' section, where this required term is defined, reads:
However the '@' option is not defined in the examples along with the other characters.
Possibly related: '@' is not accepted as a valid entry for 'Variant_seq' by the current gvf_validator.pl script.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: