Remove necessity to use view to access rangeController in ASTableNode, ASCollectionNode #1103
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
While setting the interface state of a node in certain circumstances we hit the path that first grabs the instance lock and calls
-[ASCollectionNode clearContents]
while the view is not loaded. WithinclearContents
we need access to the rangeController from the view by calling self.view.rangeController what will trigger creating the view and the assert linked in the issue will be thrown asdidLoad
should not be called with the instance locked held.For now I removed the need to use the view to access the
rangeController
what should fix the situation described above and linked here: #1094Further todos should be that we improve the locking impelementation around this area. Currently
-[ASDisplayNode clearContents]
is accessing instance variables and therefore should be prefixed withlocked_
, but-[ASCollectionNode clearContents]
is accessing the rangeController by calling self instead of using the instance variable. The follow up issue is here: #1104