Skip to content

Conversation

@Luccasoli
Copy link
Contributor

I just noticed this detail while I was reading the comparison.

I just noticed this detail while I was reading the comparison.
@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Jun 15, 2021

This pull request is being automatically deployed with Vercel (learn more).
To see the status of your deployment, click below or on the icon next to each commit.

🔍 Inspect: https://vercel.com/tannerlinsley/react-query/H71xUjLtT8LkgNhEevgFqQnbaJN9
✅ Preview: https://react-query-git-fork-luccasoli-patch-1-tannerlinsley.vercel.app

@codesandbox-ci
Copy link

codesandbox-ci bot commented Jun 15, 2021

This pull request is automatically built and testable in CodeSandbox.

To see build info of the built libraries, click here or the icon next to each commit SHA.

Latest deployment of this branch, based on commit 3f38fe1:

Sandbox Source
tannerlinsley/react-query: basic Configuration
tannerlinsley/react-query: basic-typescript Configuration

@TkDodo
Copy link
Collaborator

TkDodo commented Jun 15, 2021

Thanks. Can you maybe fix the link to the rtk query comparison page? I think it has changed recently

@Luccasoli
Copy link
Contributor Author

Luccasoli commented Jun 15, 2021

Seems to be they closed the rtk-query repository after alpha, i'll update the link to star the redux-toolkit repository

update: In fact, it looks like it has lots of links and information only referring to the alpha version of the repository, would it be a good other PR only with information and links to redux-toolkit? Since now it's just an addon

@Luccasoli Luccasoli changed the title updating comparison docs in Normalized Caching topic updating rtk-query links in Normalized Caching topic in the docs Jun 15, 2021
@TkDodo TkDodo merged commit 29559b1 into TanStack:master Jun 17, 2021
@tannerlinsley
Copy link
Member

🎉 This PR is included in version 3.17.2 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants