Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Jun 1, 2023. It is now read-only.

Fix operator implementation visibility #264

Merged

Conversation

Lukas-Stuehrk
Copy link
Member

The generated documentation could contain operator implementations which should not be included because of their access level.

@Lukas-Stuehrk Lukas-Stuehrk force-pushed the fix-operator-implementation-visibility branch from 767891b to 17d5cc9 Compare April 28, 2021 17:38
Lukas-Stuehrk added a commit to Lukas-Stuehrk/swift-doc that referenced this pull request May 11, 2021
@mattt
Copy link
Contributor

mattt commented May 18, 2021

Thanks, @Lukas-Stuehrk! Taking a look at #277 now.

@mattt mattt merged commit 4ec92a5 into SwiftDocOrg:master May 18, 2021
@Lukas-Stuehrk Lukas-Stuehrk deleted the fix-operator-implementation-visibility branch May 18, 2021 16:46
mattt added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 1, 2021
* Fix the visibility of operator implementations.

* Only include operators if they have at least one visible implementation.

* Add changelog for #264.

* Bring back links to other symbols in declarations.

* Refactor the search of linked symbols.

* Add changelog entry for #277

Co-authored-by: Mattt <mattt@me.com>
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants