You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In order to support the new completion features, I'll likely make the next or the following build ST4-only. Very useful new features like #289 might get backported to an st3 branch, but I don't think there would need to be much maintenance for that branch otherwise. PD overall seems very stable with few bugs and most of the issues or PRs I get in are feature requests. I would then decide on a case-by-case basis if it's worth backporting.
For clarification, this includes sublime-completions files and plugin-provided. Especially because of the latter, I should probably do #289 first to have it backwards compatible.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
As an update, this is almost done. What's missing are theme and command completions, which I hope to finish tomorrow and then roll out the new release.
All completions should use this the new format now, both plugins and completions files.
Unfortunatly, I wasn't able to inhibit buffer completions. You can see my attempt at 83de08a, but it doesn't work as expected. Moved that to sublimehq/sublime_text#3643.
In order to support the new completion features, I'll likely make the next or the following build ST4-only. Very useful new features like #289 might get backported to an st3 branch, but I don't think there would need to be much maintenance for that branch otherwise. PD overall seems very stable with few bugs and most of the issues or PRs I get in are feature requests. I would then decide on a case-by-case basis if it's worth backporting.
For clarification, this includes
sublime-completions
files and plugin-provided. Especially because of the latter, I should probably do #289 first to have it backwards compatible.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: