You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Back in the flow days, the template took two types, not one - one for the underlying data type, and one for the node type
These days there are a lot of opportunities for types, and most of them won't show up together. The node type, the action type, the data type, the input and output tape types, and more.
In 6, we should probably have an object that passes in the subordinated types. This means we'll need to figure out a notation for type defaults, so that states are strings-unless-we-say-otherwise, et cetera.
One interesting thing about this would be checking the states and actions against the provided type - if it's not string but rather an alternation of string literals. In that way, multiple machines could be held to a shared communications standard.
Back in the flow days, the template took two types, not one - one for the underlying data type, and one for the node type
These days there are a lot of opportunities for types, and most of them won't show up together. The node type, the action type, the data type, the input and output tape types, and more.
In 6, we should probably have an object that passes in the subordinated types. This means we'll need to figure out a notation for type defaults, so that states are strings-unless-we-say-otherwise, et cetera.
One interesting thing about this would be checking the states and actions against the provided type - if it's not string but rather an alternation of string literals. In that way, multiple machines could be held to a shared communications standard.
A notation like this would be nice:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: