Regex validation rule not working as expected

[pareeohnos]

I'm having an unusual issue with a regex validation rule. It seems to work in some cases, however I'm trying to use it to validate a date however it's saying that the date is not valid, even though it is.

http://jsfiddle.net/efp8z6Ln/260/

This fiddle shows an input field with a valid date value being validated using a regex. The regex itself works as demonstrated, and matches what it should, yet the form validation still returns false.

[elbouillon]

I'm also having an issue with regexp validation.

This regexp : regExp[/^+[0-9]{11}$/]
Don't validate +41791234567

I have that message in web console :
Uncaught SyntaxError: Invalid regular expression: /^+[0-9]{11}$/: Nothing to repeat

I think that your unvalid form is not due to your regexp but to semantic-ui form regexp rule handler

[douglasg14b]

I'm also having regex validation issues with dates.

https://jsfiddle.net/tL5xx6m9/2/

[diuzzoli]

Is there a solution to this issue?
I tried execute several RegExp with Semantic-ui form validation but always returns invalid field value.

[rishirebel]

Hi
I was trying to use RegExp /(19|20)\d\d//\s(0[1-9]|[12][0123])[:][1-6]\d/
for getting a date and time format like 1998/04/04 23:40, but it does not validate the same. I tested my RegExp several times on Regex testers, it works fine there, but it is not validating correctly on semantic ui

[Iheff]

+1

[Iheff]

Don't forget to double escape all the things. //d not /d for a digit for example.

[jlukic]

Can someone give me a simple js regexp that is not evaluating correctly? I would love to fix

[elbouillon]

Hi @jlukic, I don't remember exactly, but the problem is not regex, but mixing short rules and complet rules. There is a thread mentionning that

[frangeris]

Having the same issue here, but with an string:

RegExp
regExp[/rgb\((\d{1,3}), (\d{1,3}), (\d{1,3})\)/i]

String
rgb(243, 243, 243)

Regular expression tested here...
https://regex101.com/r/gS7bD8/1

Where's the issue?

[frangeris]

@Iheff you're just right 👍 , for future references, I found the same solution here.

[jlukic]

I'll try to look over this as the last issues to put into 2.2