Skip to content

Conversation

@krishivsaini
Copy link

@krishivsaini krishivsaini commented Oct 29, 2025

  • Added GTE and LTE token types to TokenType enum
  • Extended Lexer to recognize >= and <= operators
  • Updated Parser precedence map to include GTE and LTE
  • Added >= and <= cases to Parser's infix expression handling
  • Implemented >= and <= evaluation logic in Evaluator
  • Enables more comprehensive conditional expressions in KidCode

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Added support for the >= (greater than or equal to) and <= (less than or equal to) comparison operators, expanding the available relational operators for code expressions.

- Added GTE and LTE token types to TokenType enum
- Extended Lexer to recognize >= and <= operators
- Updated Parser precedence map to include GTE and LTE
- Added >= and <= cases to Parser's infix expression handling
- Implemented >= and <= evaluation logic in Evaluator
- Enables more comprehensive conditional expressions in KidCode
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 29, 2025

Walkthrough

This PR introduces support for two new relational operators (>= and <=) across the compiler pipeline. Changes span token type definitions, lexer tokenization, parser operator handling, and evaluator comparison execution, following existing patterns at each layer.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Token Type Definitions
kidcode-core/src/main/java/com/kidcode/core/lexer/TokenType.java
Adds two new enum constants GTE and LTE to the TokenType enum alongside existing comparison operators.
Lexer Tokenization
kidcode-core/src/main/java/com/kidcode/core/lexer/Lexer.java
Adds lookahead logic for < and > characters to recognize <= and >= tokens; emits LTE or GTE tokens when followed by =, otherwise emits LT or GT tokens.
Parser Expression Handling
kidcode-core/src/main/java/com/kidcode/core/parser/Parser.java
Registers LTE and GTE tokens in the operator precedence map with the same precedence as LT/GT, and extends infix expression parsing to recognize these operators.
Evaluator Operation Execution
kidcode-core/src/main/java/com/kidcode/core/evaluator/Evaluator.java
Adds two new cases in the numeric operation switch statement to evaluate >= (l >= r) and <= (l <= r) comparisons.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

  • Verify operator precedence assignment matches LT/GT (should be equal precedence)
  • Confirm lexer lookahead logic correctly distinguishes <= from < and >= from >
  • Spot-check evaluator comparison logic for correctness

Poem

🐰 With ears perked high, I hop through code,
Two operators find their road—
Less-than-equal, greater-too,
Comparisons old made fresh and new!

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Docstring Coverage ⚠️ Warning Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. You can run @coderabbitai generate docstrings to improve docstring coverage.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title Check ✅ Passed The pull request title "feat: Add support for >= and <= comparison operators" accurately and comprehensively describes the main objective of the changeset. All four modified files (TokenType.java, Lexer.java, Parser.java, and Evaluator.java) are directly focused on implementing these two comparison operators across the entire language processing pipeline. The title is specific, concise, and clearly conveys the primary change without vague terminology or noise. A reviewer scanning the pull request history would immediately understand what this PR accomplishes.
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d99503a and 1882f5d.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • kidcode-core/src/main/java/com/kidcode/core/evaluator/Evaluator.java (1 hunks)
  • kidcode-core/src/main/java/com/kidcode/core/lexer/Lexer.java (1 hunks)
  • kidcode-core/src/main/java/com/kidcode/core/lexer/TokenType.java (1 hunks)
  • kidcode-core/src/main/java/com/kidcode/core/parser/Parser.java (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
kidcode-core/src/main/java/com/kidcode/core/lexer/TokenType.java (1)

18-18: LGTM! Token types added correctly.

The new GTE and LTE token types are appropriately grouped with other comparison operators and follow consistent naming conventions.

kidcode-core/src/main/java/com/kidcode/core/lexer/Lexer.java (1)

127-142: LGTM! Lexer tokenization implemented correctly.

The two-character operator tokenization for <= and >= follows the same pattern as the existing == and != operators, correctly using peekChar() for lookahead and readChar() to consume the second character.

kidcode-core/src/main/java/com/kidcode/core/parser/Parser.java (2)

22-23: LGTM! Operator precedence configured correctly.

The LTE and GTE operators are correctly assigned the same precedence level as LT and GT, which is the appropriate precedence for comparison operators.


258-258: LGTM! Infix parsing extended correctly.

The LTE and GTE operators are correctly included in the infix expression parsing case statement, enabling proper parsing of these new comparison operators.

Comment on lines +205 to +206
case ">=" -> l >= r;
case "<=" -> l <= r;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🔴 Critical

🧩 Analysis chain

LGTM! Evaluation logic implemented correctly.

The >= and <= operators are correctly implemented for integer comparisons, following the same pattern as the existing > and < operators and returning boolean results as expected.

Please verify that test coverage exists for these new operators. Run the following script to check for existing tests:


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for test files and check if >= and <= operators are tested

# Find test files that test comparison operators
fd -e java -e kt test | xargs rg -l "comparison|operator|evaluator" -i

# Search for tests of comparison operators
rg -n ">=|<=" --type=java --type=kotlin -g "*test*" -g "*Test*" -C 3

Length of output: 153


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Examine test files to identify comparison operator test coverage

# Show the full content of EvaluatorTest.java to see what's tested
echo "=== EvaluatorTest.java content ==="
cat kidcode-core/src/test/java/com/kidcode/core/evaluator/EvaluatorTest.java

# Show the full content of EvaluatorStringOpTest.java for context
echo -e "\n=== EvaluatorStringOpTest.java content ==="
cat kidcode-core/src/test/java/com/kidcode/core/evaluator/EvaluatorStringOpTest.java

Length of output: 3392


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Comprehensively search for comparison operator tests across entire test directory

# Find ALL test files
echo "=== All test files in evaluator test directory ==="
find kidcode-core/src/test/java -name "*Test*.java" -type f

# Search for any tests that might test comparison operators (>, <, >=, <=, ==, !=)
echo -e "\n=== Searching for comparison operator patterns in all test files ==="
rg -n "testGreater|testLess|testEqual|comparison|operator.*test|test.*operator" --type=java -g "*test*" -i

# Search for InfixExpression with comparison operators in tests
echo -e "\n=== InfixExpression usage in test files ==="
rg -n 'InfixExpression.*[<>=!]' --type=java -g "*test*" -C 2

# Count total test methods in evaluator test files
echo -e "\n=== Evaluator-related test files ==="
find kidcode-core/src/test/java/com/kidcode/core/evaluator -name "*.java" -type f -exec basename {} \;

Length of output: 606


Tests required for >= and <= operators.

Verification confirms that no tests exist for the new >= and <= operators (nor for other comparison operators like >, <, ==, !=). Test coverage is critical before these operators can be considered production-ready.

Add test methods to kidcode-core/src/test/java/com/kidcode/core/evaluator/EvaluatorTest.java covering:

  • = with various integer comparisons (true and false cases)

  • <= with various integer comparisons (true and false cases)
  • Edge cases (equal values, negative numbers)
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In kidcode-core/src/main/java/com/kidcode/core/evaluator/Evaluator.java around
lines 205-206, new >= and <= operator handling was added but lacks unit tests;
add tests in
kidcode-core/src/test/java/com/kidcode/core/evaluator/EvaluatorTest.java that
exercise the >= and <= operators with multiple assertions: create separate test
methods forGreaterOrEqual_andLessOrEqual (or similar), include true cases (e.g.,
5 >= 3, 3 >= 3, -1 >= -2; 2 <= 4, 3 <= 3, -3 <= -1) and false cases (e.g., 2 >=
4, -2 >= -1; 5 <= 1, 0 <= -1), and include edge cases with equal values and
negative numbers to ensure behavior is correct; use the same evaluation helper
and assertion style used by existing tests so they run in the test suite.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant