Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Cache blending #158

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

Cache blending #158

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

schets
Copy link
Contributor

@schets schets commented Nov 15, 2014

Blending data is now cached, implements issue #154.

@@ -312,6 +322,20 @@ bool Terrain::check_tile_position(coord::tile pos) {

}

void Terrain::modify_tile(coord::tile pos) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why is it called modify_tile although it deletes tiles from the cache?

@TheJJ
Copy link
Member

TheJJ commented Nov 15, 2014

It looks ok so far, I'm not sure whether we can boost that a bit more. Did you do some performance tests?

@schets
Copy link
Contributor Author

schets commented Nov 15, 2014

I'm messing around with the gperf branch right now to do some performance testing. It can definitely be improved, especially whenever a new chunk is added.

@zuntrax zuntrax added lang: c++ Done in C++ code improvement Enhancement of an existing component labels Nov 17, 2014
@schets schets force-pushed the cache-blanding branch 2 times, most recently from e278d7c to 58a07bd Compare November 30, 2014 05:52
@TheJJ
Copy link
Member

TheJJ commented Dec 6, 2014

Please rebase this pullreq and maybe rename the modify_tile function, then we can merge this.

@mic-e
Copy link
Member

mic-e commented Dec 6, 2014

I wonder how github claims to be able to auto-merge this... shouldn't copying.md conflict? Edit: nvm, it will require manual fixing.

@schets schets force-pushed the cache-blanding branch 2 times, most recently from f955e84 to dd9109e Compare December 21, 2014 02:05
@franciscod
Copy link
Contributor

fix the indent, rebase, squash, merge! 👍

@TheJJ
Copy link
Member

TheJJ commented Jul 28, 2015

will be done in #287 hopefully.

@TheJJ TheJJ closed this Jul 28, 2015
@TheJJ TheJJ mentioned this pull request Aug 12, 2015
42 tasks
@Vtec234 Vtec234 mentioned this pull request Jun 30, 2018
@heinezen heinezen mentioned this pull request Apr 3, 2023
17 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
improvement Enhancement of an existing component lang: c++ Done in C++ code
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants