Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
Same question should be asked regarding Python2, now officially dead. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
-
Thanks, Andrii. Maybe we better concentrate on other things, and come back to this in five years. Cheers, Joachim |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Is there still need to support CMake 2.8? Requiring a more recent version would allow to simplify things. For instance, with CMake 3.12 one could use out-of-the-box support for Python3, which would allow removal of cmake/Modules/FindPython*.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions