You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I was trying to write unit test, and I was searching a was trying to find the best way to have deterministic test (I would like to use constant instead of dices to test the operators).
I don't this issue need to be fixed now, I just would like to have a workaround.
Ideally, the last syntax ((3;4;5;1)ms) is the one I would probably prefer.
In fact I think that I will need at one point a way to specify the full list of all the next rolls, if I want to be able to unit test the reroll and reroll until operator (witch could be only accessible in c++, not necessarily from the cli).
I was trying to write unit test, and I was searching a was trying to find the best way to have deterministic test (I would like to use constant instead of dices to test the operators).
I don't this issue need to be fixed now, I just would like to have a workaround.
With
d1
instead of constant it doesn't work either:I tried removing the
;
before them
. Them
operator dosen't do his jobAt least the
d1
version works (but it's obviously what I want to do)So I tried to do it with the
L
diceBut unfortunatly, m don't works with list, it look like
Btw, I also tried to use parenthesis instead of
m
, and it's not working as expectedThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: