Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversational UX Platform #2531

Closed
engelgabriel opened this issue Mar 17, 2016 · 4 comments
Closed

Conversational UX Platform #2531

engelgabriel opened this issue Mar 17, 2016 · 4 comments

Comments

@engelgabriel
Copy link
Member

Build intelligent speech interfaces for apps, devices, and web
Ref: https://api.ai/

@engelgabriel engelgabriel added this to the Important milestone Mar 17, 2016
@jonbaer
Copy link

jonbaer commented Mar 19, 2016

I think this could be something like an admin server package inside of rocketchat-hubot (ie: Rocket.Cat) which allows for full customizations (scripts to load, NLP/NER setup, etc) ... there is a possibility that more bot applications (and domains) may come from work being done on Botkit (https://github.com/howdyai/botkit) than Hubot at some point so it would be nice to see support for both. I think the api.ai tools are pretty domain specific and could probably already work out of the box with integration webhooks as is. I think this all depends on how much bot setup you would like to see happen inside of Rocket.Chat itself (from scalability viewpoint it may need to be a different app IMHO).

@timkinnane
Copy link
Contributor

Seems like some very broad issues being discussed here that would not be addressed in this repo. @engelgabriel should we close or re-purpose this issue? It might be actionable to support a Dialogflow adapter, other than that I think the larger issue of creating an interface for conversation design would be something specific to each bot platform/framework. I don't see it being possible to provide as an agnostic UX unless it was simply embedding the dashboard within admin views.

@TwizzyDizzy
Copy link

As discussed: please add a label "feature-needs-review".

/cc @seanpackham

Cheers
Thomas

@timkinnane
Copy link
Contributor

Closing now as this discussion predates the bots project which has now identified targeted framework adapters for

@theorenck theorenck removed this from the Mid-term milestone Dec 12, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants