Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Auto calibration continuing despite reaching precision #52

Open
dprotter opened this issue Nov 29, 2015 · 3 comments
Open

Auto calibration continuing despite reaching precision #52

dprotter opened this issue Nov 29, 2015 · 3 comments

Comments

@dprotter
Copy link

Hey there, I've been using the auto calibration on my delta using FSRs and have had 2 issues. (I'm running everything via Pronterface)

  1. when the probe repeatedly probes the edge of the bed often times the FSR directly opposite will activate when the probe lifts. I think it is related to how FSRs are tared (how the code determines a baseline resistance, then looks for changes over a certain % of baseline resistance). After repeated probing it seems like opposite FSRs are tared, so that the weight of the bed activates them. This leads to the probe repeatedly reading as "activated" and calculating a giant range.

  2. if I can get the FSRs to behave (although they usually have the error above at least once an autocalibration) the autocalibraiton continues even after the correct precision appears to be reached, although looking through the code I couldnt quickly figure out how precision is defined. It works fine for looser precision, IE A0.1 or 0.08, but once I get down to around 0.05 it just keeps going.

For instance, I ran G30 D288.04 A0.05

and got this (the calibration continued until iteration 99, then gave the normal successful calibration message:

Iteration: 52
Adjusting Z-Height to: 221.34 mm..
|
-7.1250
-7.1250 Exact Match: -7.1250 Range: 0.0000 mm
|
-7.0250
-7.0250 Exact Match: -7.0250 Range: 0.0000 mm
|
-7.0875
-7.0750
-7.0625
-7.0625 Exact Match: -7.0625 Range: 0.0250 mm
|
-7.0625
-7.0625 Exact Match: -7.0625 Range: 0.0000 mm
|
-7.3750
-7.3750 Exact Match: -7.3750 Range: 0.0000 mm
|
-7.2500
-7.2625
-7.2500
-7.2500 Exact Match: -7.2500 Range: 0.0125 mm
|
-7.3375
-7.3375 Exact Match: -7.3375 Range: 0.0000 mm
| Z-Tower Endstop Offsets
| -7.0250 X:-6.25 Y:-5.44 Z:-4.86
| -7.0625 -7.3375 Tower Offsets
| -7.1250 A:-0.04 b:-0.21 C:0.25
| -7.0625 -7.2500 I:0.00 J:0.00 K:-0.25
| -7.3750 Delta Radius: 171.8750
| X-Tower Y-Tower Diagonal Rod: 288.0400

then, after it reaches the 99th iteration:

Iteration: 99
Adjusting Z-Height to: 221.34 mm..
|
-7.1000
-7.0875
-7.1125
-7.1125 Exact Match: -7.1125 Range: 0.0250 mm
|
-6.9750
-7.0000
-7.0125
-7.0250
-7.0250 Exact Match: -7.0250 Range: 0.0500 mm
|
-7.0000
-7.0000 Exact Match: -7.0000 Range: 0.0000 mm
|
-7.0375
-7.0375 Exact Match: -7.0375 Range: 0.0000 mm
|
-7.3750
-7.3875
-7.3625
-7.3750
-7.3625
-7.3625 Exact Match: -7.3625 Range: 0.0250 mm
|
-7.2625
-7.2625 Exact Match: -7.2625 Range: 0.0000 mm
|
-7.3000
-7.3125
-7.3250
-7.3250 Exact Match: -7.3250 Range: 0.0250 mm
| Z-Tower Endstop Offsets
| -7.0250 X:-6.25 Y:-5.44 Z:-4.86
| -7.0000 -7.3250 Tower Offsets
| -7.1125 A:-0.04 b:-0.21 C:0.25
| -7.0375 -7.2625 I:0.00 J:0.00 K:-0.25
| -7.3625 Delta Radius: 171.8750
| X-Tower Y-Tower Diagonal Rod: 288.0400
Auto Calibration Complete
Issue M500 Command to save calibration settings to EPROM (if enabled)

Thanks for the help!

@Sberfield
Copy link

Are you using an endstop board? It shouldn't matter if multiple switches trigger - any switch triggered should read as a trigger and cause the probe to move on. Are you sure your bed isn't shifting up and down when probed? That could throw things off.

@itubal
Copy link

itubal commented Dec 15, 2015

I'm using a proximity sensor and i'm getting the same "error" after 99 iterations. I'm using a switches for endstops, not optical sensor.

@itubal
Copy link

itubal commented Dec 21, 2015

With the "testing" version and a proximity sensor and after 27 iterations, the program said that the printer was calibrated and... the printer was NOT calibrated. LOL
Anybody knows how to solve the "Pringles potato effect"?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants