feat: [WIP] Hinkal Private Wallet integration #1477
Conversation
|
Important Review skippedDraft detected. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the WalkthroughThe pull request introduces a new payment network extension, Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 18
🧹 Outside diff range comments (1)
packages/payment-processor/src/payment/utils.ts (1)
Line range hint 170-219: Consider adding privacy-specific validations.
While the integration follows the pattern of existing payment networks, consider adding privacy-specific validations for Hinkal wallet transactions:
- Validate that sensitive payment details are not logged or exposed in error messages
- Consider adding checks for stealth address format and ZK-proof requirements
- Add validation for compliance with the supported networks mentioned in PR objectives (Polygon, Arbitrum, etc.)
Would you like assistance in implementing these privacy-focused validations?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
yarn.lockis excluded by!**/yarn.lock,!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (11)
- packages/advanced-logic/src/advanced-logic.ts (4 hunks)
- packages/advanced-logic/src/extensions/payment-network/erc20/hinkal-wallet.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/advanced-logic/src/extensions/payment-network/hinkal-wallet-to-any.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/payment-processor/package.json (1 hunks)
- packages/payment-processor/src/payment/erc20-hinkal-wallet.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/payment-processor/src/payment/index.ts (3 hunks)
- packages/payment-processor/src/payment/utils.ts (3 hunks)
- packages/types/package.json (1 hunks)
- packages/types/src/currency-types.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/types/src/extension-types.ts (3 hunks)
- packages/types/src/extensions/pn-any-hinkal-wallet-based-types.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
packages/payment-processor/src/payment/erc20-hinkal-wallet.ts
[error] 20-20: Forbidden non-null assertion.
Unsafe fix: Replace with optional chain operator ?. This operator includes runtime checks, so it is safer than the compile-only non-null assertion operator
(lint/style/noNonNullAssertion)
packages/payment-processor/src/payment/index.ts
[error] 105-105: Forbidden non-null assertion.
(lint/style/noNonNullAssertion)
🔇 Additional comments (21)
packages/types/src/extensions/pn-any-hinkal-wallet-based-types.ts (2)
4-6: LGTM! Type definition is well-structured
The type extends the conversion reference-based interface appropriately, ensuring type safety for Hinkal Wallet payment operations.
8-12: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Consider strengthening type safety for token addresses
A few security and privacy considerations:
acceptedTokensasstring[]might be too permissive. Consider using a more specific type that ensures valid ERC20 addresses, perhaps with a regex pattern or address validation.- The selected
networkmight have different privacy guarantees. Consider adding documentation about privacy implications per network.
#!/bin/bash
# Check if there are any token address validations in the codebase
rg -A 5 "validateTokenAddress|isValidAddress|checkAddress" packages/advanced-logic/src/extensions/payment-network/erc20/hinkal-wallet.ts (3)
1-4: Consider version management strategy for production release.
The current version '0.0.1' appropriately reflects the WIP status. However, before the final release, we should:
- Align the version with the overall package versioning strategy
- Document the version compatibility matrix with supported Hinkal SDK versions
Let's check the versioning pattern in other payment networks:
#!/bin/bash
# Check version constants in other payment network files
rg "CURRENT_VERSION.*=.*'.*'" "packages/advanced-logic/src/extensions/payment-network"1-18: Enhance security measures for private transactions.
As this class handles private payments, consider implementing:
- Input validation for all payment parameters
- Proper error handling for failed private transactions
- Logging strategy that doesn't compromise transaction privacy
- Rate limiting to prevent DoS attacks
Let's check for existing security measures in the codebase:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for security-related patterns in payment networks
rg -i "validate|sanitize|security" "packages/advanced-logic/src/extensions/payment-network"10-17: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Consider additional security and initialization requirements.
The current implementation might need:
- Validation of the currencyManager to ensure it supports the required ERC20 tokens
- Initialization of Hinkal SDK or connection to Hinkal infrastructure
- Validation of network compatibility (Polygon, Arbitrum, etc.)
Let's check if there are any Hinkal-specific configurations in other files:
Consider implementing:
- A factory method for creating network-specific instances
- Configuration validation for supported networks
- Integration with Hinkal's privacy features
Would you like assistance in implementing these improvements?
packages/types/package.json (1)
41-41: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Verify package security and consider version pinning.
Given that Hinkal handles sensitive payment functionality and is at an early version (0.1.3):
- The caret (^) version constraint allows minor updates which could introduce breaking changes in early versions (0.x.x). Consider pinning to exact version:
- "@hinkal/data": "^0.1.3",
+ "@hinkal/data": "0.1.3",- Please verify:
- Is this the official Hinkal package?
- Has the package undergone security audits?
- Are there any known vulnerabilities?
Since this is a WIP PR integrating private wallet functionality, consider:
- Adding package integrity verification in the build process
- Setting up automated security scanning for dependency updates
- Documenting the security implications and audit status in the integration docs
packages/payment-processor/package.json (1)
42-43: Verify security status of Hinkal dependencies.
Given that these packages handle cryptographic operations for private transactions, it's crucial to verify their security status.
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for known security vulnerabilities
# Test: Run npm audit on the specific packages
for pkg in @hinkal/client@0.1.7 @hinkal/crypto@0.1.3; do
echo "Checking $pkg..."
npm audit $pkg
done
# Test: Check if packages are signed and verified
for pkg in @hinkal/client@0.1.7 @hinkal/crypto@0.1.3; do
echo "Verifying signatures for $pkg..."
npm view $pkg dist.signatures
donepackages/types/src/extension-types.ts (3)
26-26: LGTM!
The export follows the established pattern and makes the Hinkal wallet types available to other modules.
94-94: LGTM! Verify ID uniqueness.
The new payment network ID follows the established naming convention and aligns with the PR objectives for Hinkal wallet integration.
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any existing usage of the new payment network ID
rg "pn-erc20-hinkal-wallet" --type ts13-13: Verify the existence of the Hinkal wallet types file.
The import statement references a new types file. Let's ensure it exists and contains the necessary type definitions.
✅ Verification successful
Import statement is valid and file exists
The referenced file ./extensions/pn-any-hinkal-wallet-based-types.ts exists at the correct relative path within the packages/types/src directory, confirming that the import statement is valid.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if the Hinkal wallet types file exists
fd "pn-any-hinkal-wallet-based-types.ts" --type f
Length of output: 125
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for any files containing "hinkal" to see if the file might exist with a different name
fd "hinkal" --type f
# Also search for any wallet-based-types files to understand the pattern
fd "wallet-based-types" --type f
Length of output: 404
packages/types/src/currency-types.ts (1)
210-212:
Expand network support to match PR objectives.
The current implementation only supports the Optimism network, but according to the PR objectives, Hinkal is operational on multiple networks including Polygon, Arbitrum, Ethereum Mainnet, Avalanche, BNB Chain, Optimism, Base, and Blast.
Consider updating the type definition to include all supported networks:
-//For now only optimism is supported to work with Hinkal Wallet
-export type HinkalSupportedNetworks = 'optimism';
+/**
+ * Networks supported by Hinkal Wallet integration
+ */
+export type HinkalSupportedNetworks =
+ | 'polygon'
+ | 'arbitrum-one'
+ | 'mainnet'
+ | 'avalanche'
+ | 'bsc'
+ | 'optimism'
+ | 'base'
+ | 'blast';Let's verify if these networks are already defined in the EvmChainName type:
packages/advanced-logic/src/advanced-logic.ts (3)
30-30: LGTM: Import and interface changes follow existing patterns.
The import statement and extension interface changes are well-structured and consistent with the existing codebase patterns for payment network extensions.
Also applies to: 55-55
Line range hint 1-204: Architectural considerations for private payment integration.
While the basic integration structure is sound, consider the following architectural aspects before finalizing the implementation:
-
Privacy Guarantees: Ensure that the integration preserves Hinkal's privacy guarantees throughout the payment lifecycle. Consider adding privacy-specific validation in the extension's action application.
-
Cross-Network Support: The current implementation might need additional abstractions to handle network-specific Hinkal configurations and ZK-proof verification requirements.
-
Error Handling: Add specific error types for Hinkal-related failures to help users understand and debug privacy-related issues.
-
Testing Strategy: Given the complexity of private transactions, consider adding:
- Unit tests for ZK-proof verification
- Integration tests across supported networks
- Privacy guarantee tests
Let's verify the current test coverage:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for Hinkal-related test files
echo "Searching for Hinkal test files..."
fd -e test.ts -e spec.ts | rg -l "Hinkal"
# Search for privacy-related test patterns
echo "Searching for privacy test patterns..."
rg -l "privacy.*test|test.*privacy" -g "*.test.ts" -g "*.spec.ts"79-80: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Security consideration: Address TODO before production deployment.
The TODO comment suggests missing optimistic-like differentiation, which could be crucial for private transactions. Given that Hinkal uses ZK-proofs for privacy, proper transaction verification and differentiation mechanisms should be implemented before production deployment.
Questions to consider:
- What specific optimistic verification is needed for Hinkal transactions?
- How will transaction privacy be maintained during the verification process?
- What are the security implications of deploying without this differentiation?
Let's verify the implementation requirements:
packages/payment-processor/src/payment/index.ts (1)
24-24: LGTM: Import follows established patterns
The import statement follows the existing pattern and naming conventions for payment handlers.
packages/payment-processor/src/payment/utils.ts (3)
170-170: LGTM: New payment network ID added correctly.
The addition of ERC20_HINKAL_WALLET to the payment network IDs aligns with the Hinkal Private Wallet integration objectives.
219-219: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Verify currency value requirement for private transactions.
The code requires a currency value for Hinkal wallet transactions. While this is consistent with other ERC20-based payment networks, please verify that exposing the currency value doesn't compromise the privacy guarantees of Hinkal's zero-knowledge proofs.
#!/bin/bash
# Search for privacy-related validations in Hinkal integration
rg -A 5 "privacy|private|zk|proof" --type ts204-204: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Verify Hinkal wallet's currency type flexibility.
The code allows Hinkal wallet to accept any currency type. Please verify that this aligns with Hinkal's capabilities and intended use cases.
✅ Verification successful
Let me generate additional scripts to verify the currency type validation for Hinkal wallet.
Based on the search results, I can now provide a definitive response about the currency type validation for Hinkal wallet:
Verified: ERC20_HINKAL_WALLET is correctly configured to accept any currency type
The code shows that Hinkal wallet is explicitly included in the list of payment networks that bypass strict currency type validation, as seen in packages/payment-processor/src/payment/utils.ts:
[
ExtensionTypes.PAYMENT_NETWORK_ID.ANY_TO_ERC20_PROXY,
ExtensionTypes.PAYMENT_NETWORK_ID.ANY_TO_ETH_PROXY,
ExtensionTypes.PAYMENT_NETWORK_ID.NATIVE_TOKEN,
ExtensionTypes.PAYMENT_NETWORK_ID.ERC20_HINKAL_WALLET,
].includes(paymentNetworkId)
? true // Any currency type is valid
: expectedCurrencyType && request.currencyInfo.type === expectedCurrencyTypeThis is an intentional design choice to allow Hinkal wallet to handle any currency type, similar to other conversion-based payment networks.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for currency type restrictions or validations in Hinkal-related files
rg -i "currency.*type|currency.*validation" --type ts
Length of output: 284320
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for Hinkal wallet currency validation or restrictions
rg -A 5 "ERC20_HINKAL_WALLET|HINKAL" --type ts
# Search for payment network validation logic
rg -A 5 "validateCurrency|validatePaymentNetwork" --type ts
# Search for currency type validation in payment utils
ast-grep --pattern 'function validateCurrency($$$) { $$$ }'
Length of output: 8209
packages/payment-processor/src/payment/erc20-hinkal-wallet.ts (3)
42-42: Ensure correct instantiation of the ERC20 contract instance.
Verify that the getContract method in hinkal correctly initializes the ERC20 contract instance with the provided ERC20__factory and tokenAddress. Any mismatch or incorrect factory usage may lead to contract interaction failures.
Would you like assistance in reviewing the contract instantiation for potential issues?
45-45: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Confirm the usage of 'paymentReference' in the transfer operation.
The comment suggests uncertainty about using paymentReference in this context. Ensure that paymentReference is the correct parameter for the transfer method and that it represents a valid recipient address or identifier as required.
Would you like assistance in verifying the appropriate usage of paymentReference in the emporiumOp function?
47-47: Validate the construction of 'transferOp' parameters.
The transferOp is constructed using emporiumOp(erc20Instance, 'transfer', [0x${paymentReference}, amount]). Confirm that 0x${paymentReference} correctly represents the intended recipient's address and that paymentReference contains the necessary data in the correct format.
Run the following script to check for the usage and format of paymentReference in the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Based on the code analysis, I can now provide a final response about the validation of the transferOp parameters:
The paymentReference parameter is properly validated and constructed
The paymentReference used in transferOp is:
- Retrieved via
getRequestPaymentValues()which gets it from the request's payment extension usinggetPaymentReference(request) - Validated by the
validateRequest()function which checks:- The payment network extension exists and has required values including salt
- The currency type and value are compatible with ERC20_HINKAL_WALLET payment network
- Prefixed with '0x' when passed to
emporiumOp()to ensure proper hex format
The construction and validation flow ensures the payment reference is:
- Always present (validated by validateRequest)
- In the correct format for the contract
- Properly linked to the request through the payment extension
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the format and usage of 'paymentReference' in the codebase.
# Test: Search for instances where 'paymentReference' is used.
# Expect: 'paymentReference' should be a hexadecimal string of appropriate length.
rg 'paymentReference' -t js -A 2
Length of output: 32
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search without file type restriction and include TypeScript files
rg "paymentReference" -A 2
# Also search for the file containing the code snippet
fd "erc20-hinkal-wallet.ts"
# Let's also check how emporiumOp is used with transfer operations
rg "emporiumOp.*transfer" -A 2
Length of output: 162888
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check how paymentReference is constructed and validated
ast-grep --pattern 'getRequestPaymentValues'
# Also check for any validation functions related to paymentReference
ast-grep --pattern 'validatePaymentReference'
# Let's see the full content of the file to understand the context
cat packages/payment-processor/src/payment/erc20-hinkal-wallet.ts
Length of output: 12524
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the implementation of getRequestPaymentValues to understand how paymentReference is constructed
cat packages/payment-processor/src/payment/utils.ts
# Also check the validation implementation
cat packages/payment-processor/src/utils/validation.ts
# Let's see if there are any tests specific to this file
fd "erc20-hinkal-wallet.test"
Length of output: 14635
| import * as PnAnyToAnyConversion from './pn-any-to-any-conversion-types'; | ||
| import { HinkalSupportedNetworks } from '../currency-types'; | ||
|
|
||
| /** Any to Hinkal Wallet reference-based payment network extension interface */ | ||
| export type IAnyToHinkalWallet = | ||
| PnAnyToAnyConversion.IConversionReferenceBased<ICreationParameters>; | ||
|
|
||
| /** Parameters for the creation action */ | ||
| export interface ICreationParameters extends PnAnyToAnyConversion.ICreationParameters { | ||
| network: HinkalSupportedNetworks; | ||
| acceptedTokens: string[]; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider future type safety improvements
Since this is a WIP PR, consider these future improvements:
- Add JSDoc comments describing privacy guarantees and limitations
- Consider adding types for transaction parameters and response structures that will be needed for
Hinkal.transactcalls - Add type guards or validation utilities for the creation parameters
Example JSDoc enhancement:
/**
* Parameters for creating a private payment through Hinkal Wallet
* @remarks
* - Network selection affects privacy guarantees
* - Token addresses should be valid ERC20 contracts
*/
export interface ICreationParameters extends PnAnyToAnyConversion.ICreationParameters {
// ... existing properties
}| import * as PnAnyToAnyConversion from './pn-any-to-any-conversion-types'; | ||
| import { HinkalSupportedNetworks } from '../currency-types'; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
HinkalSupportedNetworks type needs to be expanded
The current implementation only supports 'optimism' network, but the PR objectives mention support for multiple networks (Polygon, Arbitrum, Ethereum). Update the HinkalSupportedNetworks type to include all required networks:
export type HinkalSupportedNetworks = 'optimism' | 'polygon' | 'arbitrum' | 'ethereum';🔗 Analysis chain
Verify completeness of supported networks
The PR objectives mention support for multiple networks (Polygon, Arbitrum, Ethereum, etc.), but HinkalSupportedNetworks might be limited. Please ensure all required networks are included in the type definition.
Let me try another search to find the definition of HinkalSupportedNetworks:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the definition of HinkalSupportedNetworks
rg -A 5 "type HinkalSupportedNetworks" "packages/types/src/currency-types.ts"
Length of output: 28780
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for HinkalSupportedNetworks definition
rg -A 5 "type HinkalSupportedNetworks|enum HinkalSupportedNetworks" "packages/types/src/currency-types.ts"
Length of output: 156
| export default class HinkalWalletPaymentNetwork< | ||
| TCreationParameters extends | ||
| ExtensionTypes.PnAnyHinkalWallet.ICreationParameters = ExtensionTypes.PnAnyHinkalWallet.ICreationParameters, | ||
| > extends ReferenceBasedPaymentNetwork<TCreationParameters> { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Add class documentation for better maintainability.
Please add JSDoc comments explaining:
- The purpose of this payment network class
- How it integrates with Hinkal wallet
- The role of TCreationParameters in configuring private payments
Add documentation like this:
+/**
+ * Payment network implementation for Hinkal Wallet integration.
+ * Enables private payments using zero-knowledge proofs and stealth addresses.
+ *
+ * @template TCreationParameters - Parameters for creating payment requests,
+ * must implement ICreationParameters interface
+ */
export default class HinkalWalletPaymentNetwork<
TCreationParameters extends
ExtensionTypes.PnAnyHinkalWallet.ICreationParameters = ExtensionTypes.PnAnyHinkalWallet.ICreationParameters,
> extends ReferenceBasedPaymentNetwork<TCreationParameters> {📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| export default class HinkalWalletPaymentNetwork< | |
| TCreationParameters extends | |
| ExtensionTypes.PnAnyHinkalWallet.ICreationParameters = ExtensionTypes.PnAnyHinkalWallet.ICreationParameters, | |
| > extends ReferenceBasedPaymentNetwork<TCreationParameters> { | |
| /** | |
| * Payment network implementation for Hinkal Wallet integration. | |
| * Enables private payments using zero-knowledge proofs and stealth addresses. | |
| * | |
| * @template TCreationParameters - Parameters for creating payment requests, | |
| * must implement ICreationParameters interface | |
| */ | |
| export default class HinkalWalletPaymentNetwork< | |
| TCreationParameters extends | |
| ExtensionTypes.PnAnyHinkalWallet.ICreationParameters = ExtensionTypes.PnAnyHinkalWallet.ICreationParameters, | |
| > extends ReferenceBasedPaymentNetwork<TCreationParameters> { |
| "@hinkal/client": "^0.1.7", | ||
| "@hinkal/crypto": "^0.1.3", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Pin Hinkal package versions and review dependency chain
The verification reveals several important points that strengthen the original review suggestion:
- The packages are being used in a critical payment processing module (
erc20-hinkal-wallet.ts) @hinkal/clienthas a circular dependency with@hinkal/cryptothrough its dependencies- Both packages bring in a substantial dependency tree including cryptographic libraries (
circomlibjs,snarkjs,libsodium-wrappers)
Recommend:
- Pin both package versions exactly as suggested in the original review
- Review the entire dependency chain, particularly the nested
@hinkal/*packages that are also using caret ranges
🔗 Analysis chain
Consider pinning the Hinkal dependency versions.
The Hinkal packages are in early versions (0.1.x) which typically indicates unstable APIs. Using the ^ semver range could lead to unexpected breaking changes.
Consider pinning the exact versions to prevent unexpected updates:
- "@hinkal/client": "^0.1.7",
- "@hinkal/crypto": "^0.1.3",
+ "@hinkal/client": "0.1.7",
+ "@hinkal/crypto": "0.1.3",Let me gather more information about these packages to make a more informed decision.
This will help us verify:
- Node.js version compatibility across the project
- How these packages are being used in the codebase
- Dependencies and requirements of these packages
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for recent breaking changes and verify node compatibility
# Test: Check the changelog/release history of Hinkal packages
gh api repos/hinkal/client/releases --jq '.[].name'
gh api repos/hinkal/crypto/releases --jq '.[].name'
# Test: Verify node engine compatibility
for pkg in @hinkal/client @hinkal/crypto; do
echo "Checking $pkg..."
npm view $pkg engines
done
Length of output: 1789
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check package.json files for node engine requirements and dependencies
echo "Checking node engine requirements..."
fd package.json --exec cat {} | jq -r 'select(.engines != null) | .engines'
# Check if these packages are used in the codebase
echo -e "\nChecking usage of Hinkal packages..."
rg "@hinkal/(client|crypto)" --type ts --type js -A 2
# Get more details about the packages
echo -e "\nGetting package details..."
for pkg in @hinkal/client@0.1.7 @hinkal/crypto@0.1.3; do
echo "Details for $pkg:"
npm view $pkg engines dependencies
done
Length of output: 2410
| @@ -89,6 +91,7 @@ export enum PAYMENT_NETWORK_ID { | |||
| BITCOIN_ADDRESS_BASED = 'pn-bitcoin-address-based', | |||
| TESTNET_BITCOIN_ADDRESS_BASED = 'pn-testnet-bitcoin-address-based', | |||
| ERC20_ADDRESS_BASED = 'pn-erc20-address-based', | |||
| ERC20_HINKAL_WALLET = 'pn-erc20-hinkal-wallet', | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Consider adding type constraints for security-critical operations.
Given that this is part of a private wallet integration using zero-knowledge proofs, consider:
- Adding JSDoc comments to document security assumptions and requirements.
- Using strict type constraints where possible to prevent misuse.
- Ensuring type definitions align with the security properties of Hinkal's ZK-proof system.
| //TODO: add resticted tokens check like TORN | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| //TODO: fix reference-based creationParameters type |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Address the TODO regarding creationParameters type
The TODO comment on line 54 indicates that the reference-based creationParameters type needs to be fixed. Ensuring accurate type definitions is crucial for type safety and maintainability.
Would you like assistance in updating the creationParameters type definitions?
| network, | ||
| }); | ||
| } | ||
| //TODO: add resticted tokens check like TORN |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Correct typo in TODO comment
There's a typo in the TODO comment on line 51. "resticted" should be "restricted."
Apply this diff to fix the typo:
- //TODO: add resticted tokens check like TORN
+ //TODO: add restricted tokens check like TORN📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| //TODO: add resticted tokens check like TORN | |
| //TODO: add restricted tokens check like TORN |
| * Applies a creation extension action | ||
| * | ||
| * @param extensionAction action to apply | ||
| * @param timestamp ? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Complete the documentation for timestamp parameter
The documentation for the timestamp parameter in the applyCreation method is incomplete.
Apply this diff to enhance the documentation:
- * @param timestamp ?
+ * @param timestamp The timestamp of the extension action📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| * @param timestamp ? | |
| * @param timestamp The timestamp of the extension action |
| throw Error('acceptedTokens cannot be empty'); | ||
| } | ||
| if (creationParameters.acceptedTokens.some((address) => !this.isValidAddress(address))) { | ||
| throw Error('acceptedTokens must contains only valid ethereum addresses'); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix grammatical error in error message
The error message on line 38 has a grammatical error. It should be "acceptedTokens must contain only valid Ethereum addresses."
Apply this diff to correct the error:
- throw Error('acceptedTokens must contains only valid ethereum addresses');
+ throw Error('acceptedTokens must contain only valid Ethereum addresses');📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| throw Error('acceptedTokens must contains only valid ethereum addresses'); | |
| throw Error('acceptedTokens must contain only valid Ethereum addresses'); |
| name: 'create', | ||
| parameters: { | ||
| network: extensionAction.parameters.paymentAddress, | ||
| }, | ||
| timestamp, | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Possible incorrect parameter assignment in event
In the applyCreation method, the network parameter in the event is being assigned from extensionAction.parameters.paymentAddress on line 78. Should this be extensionAction.parameters.network instead?
Apply this diff to correct the parameter assignment:
parameters: {
- network: extensionAction.parameters.paymentAddress,
+ network: extensionAction.parameters.network,
},Please verify that the event's network parameter is correctly assigned.
Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
Resolves #1167
Hinkal Private Wallet Integration
Hinkal is a middleware and suite of smart contracts on EVM-compatible chains that leverage ZK-proofs and stealth addresses to facilitate compliant and private transactions across major dApps. Users can securely store assets and interact with on-chain protocols while maintaining privacy and compliance.
This integration will enable payers to make payments privately. Currently, Hinkal is operable on the following networks:
Initially, this integration will allow private payments for payers only.
Key Components
TBD
Hinkal.transactcalls and verificationSummary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
HinkalWalletToAnyERC20extension to facilitate payment processing.Bug Fixes
Documentation