Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make ViewObservables consistent with each other #22

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 15, 2014
Merged

Make ViewObservables consistent with each other #22

merged 3 commits into from
Oct 15, 2014

Conversation

nsk-mironov
Copy link
Contributor

As discussed in #20. Resolves #7 as well.

@kboyarshinov
Copy link
Contributor

Nice! I see you moved operators to rx.android package. And removed generics as we discussed. I'll do the same with OnItemClick operator and event in #20.

@@ -77,30 +81,30 @@ public void testWithoutInitialValue() {
@Test
@SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
public void testWithInitialValue() {
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

just a general style remark. The test name isn't very good at documenting the desired behavior. It could as well be called "testThatItWorks" and would convey the same information :-) I prefer tests that are small and focused, with ideally only a single given-when-then case. This helps tremendously when trying to understand what the exact behavior under different cases is (happy path, sad path, corner cases)

@mttkay
Copy link
Collaborator

mttkay commented Oct 9, 2014

👍

@mttkay
Copy link
Collaborator

mttkay commented Oct 13, 2014

Is this ready to go in?

@nsk-mironov
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mttkay I think so.

mttkay added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 15, 2014
Make ViewObservables consistent with each other
@mttkay mttkay merged commit c174620 into ReactiveX:0.x Oct 15, 2014
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants