Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

提交stm32 bsp drv_pwm.c里面的一个小建议 #6517

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Oct 28, 2022

Conversation

100ask-alen
Copy link
Contributor

@100ask-alen 100ask-alen commented Oct 14, 2022

拉取/合并请求描述:(PR description)

[
在使用stm32的pwm驱动时,发现其初始化channel的时候是根据device->channel这个值去初始化的,device->channel这个值是在pwm_configh.h里面定义设置的,又根据rtt的pwm例程,和常规习惯,应该大多数人会更喜欢设置channel=1/2/3/4,而不是在pwm_configh.h中将channel设置为TIM_CHANNEL_1/2/3/4,因此建议drv_pwm.c做出PR中的修改。

在实际开发中,因pwm_configh.h的示例均是.channel=0,又没有做出解释说明要让.channel=TIM_CHANNEL_1/2/3/4的值,容易误操作导致没有成功输出PWM,这是我在实际开发中遇到的现实问题,因而提出此建议。
]

以下的内容不应该在提交PR时的message修改,修改下述message,PR会被直接关闭。请在提交PR后,浏览器查看PR并对以下检查项逐项check,没问题后逐条在页面上打钩。
The following content must not be changed in the submitted PR message. Otherwise, the PR will be closed immediately. After submitted PR, please use a web browser to visit PR, and check items one by one, and ticked them if no problem.

当前拉取/合并请求的状态 Intent for your PR

必须选择一项 Choose one (Mandatory):

  • 本拉取/合并请求是一个草稿版本 This PR is for a code-review and is intended to get feedback
  • 本拉取/合并请求是一个成熟版本 This PR is mature, and ready to be integrated into the repo

代码质量 Code Quality:

我在这个拉取/合并请求中已经考虑了 As part of this pull request, I've considered the following:

  • 已经仔细查看过代码改动的对比 Already check the difference between PR and old code
  • 代码风格正确,包括缩进空格,命名及其他风格 Style guide is adhered to, including spacing, naming and other styles
  • 没有垃圾代码,代码尽量精简,不包含#if 0代码,不包含已经被注释了的代码 All redundant code is removed and cleaned up
  • 所有变更均有原因及合理的,并且不会影响到其他软件组件代码或BSP All modifications are justified and not affect other components or BSP
  • 对难懂代码均提供对应的注释 I've commented appropriately where code is tricky
  • 本拉取/合并请求代码是高质量的 Code in this PR is of high quality
  • 本拉取/合并使用formatting等源码格式化工具确保格式符合RT-Thread代码规范 This PR complies with RT-Thread code specification

@Guozhanxin
Copy link
Member

感觉是可以的,只要hal库里的定义不改的话。
image
还有是不是需要在代码里加个判断,安全一点

#if (TIM_CHANNEL_4 != 0x0000000CU ) 
#error “xxx”
#endif

@Guozhanxin Guozhanxin added the +1 Agree +1 label Oct 24, 2022
@100ask-alen
Copy link
Contributor Author

channel = 0x04 * (device->channel - 1)
这个算式我是抄的原drv_pwm.c里面一个函数里面的,原来的drv_pwm.c支持这样的算式的话,应该影响不大?
我不是很清楚原来的stm32的drv_pwm.c是谁写的。

@100ask-alen
Copy link
Contributor Author

源文件的
static rt_err_t drv_pwm_enable(TIM_HandleTypeDef *htim, struct rt_pwm_configuration *configuration, rt_bool_t enable)
static rt_err_t drv_pwm_get(TIM_HandleTypeDef *htim, struct rt_pwm_configuration *configuration)
static rt_err_t drv_pwm_set(TIM_HandleTypeDef *htim, struct rt_pwm_configuration *configuration)
static rt_err_t drv_pwm_set_pulse(TIM_HandleTypeDef *htim, struct rt_pwm_configuration *configuration)
这些函数都是这样换算的通道值。

@Guozhanxin
Copy link
Member

源文件的 static rt_err_t drv_pwm_enable(TIM_HandleTypeDef *htim, struct rt_pwm_configuration *configuration, rt_bool_t enable) static rt_err_t drv_pwm_get(TIM_HandleTypeDef *htim, struct rt_pwm_configuration *configuration) static rt_err_t drv_pwm_set(TIM_HandleTypeDef *htim, struct rt_pwm_configuration *configuration) static rt_err_t drv_pwm_set_pulse(TIM_HandleTypeDef *htim, struct rt_pwm_configuration *configuration) 这些函数都是这样换算的通道值。

嗯,感觉应该没啥问题

@100ask-alen
Copy link
Contributor Author

建议在pwm_config.h里面加点注释,说明下那个结构体的几个成员该如何设置值,合法范围是多少。

给stm32f4的pwm_config.h添加几句注释说明参数取值范围。
@mysterywolf
Copy link
Member

嗯嗯 可以增加注释 说实话 我都不知道那个channel成员变量是干啥的 看都设置为0 我也没管它 ,但是需要注意下 rt-thread的注释是用/**/ 而不是//

更改注释方式,从//改为/**/
@100ask-alen
Copy link
Contributor Author

其它系列的pwm通道数,不是全都了解各有多少个,现在不确定是否都是每个定时器只有4个通道, 其它系列的pwm_config.h也需要改一改才行,我找个时间改改看,先不忙合并吧。

@mysterywolf mysterywolf added the in progress PR/issue in progress. label Oct 24, 2022
@mysterywolf
Copy link
Member

https://github.com/mysterywolf/formatting 可以用这个脚本扫描一下

@mysterywolf
Copy link
Member

如果PR 已经准备好 请告知

@mysterywolf mysterywolf added the BSP: STM32 BSP related with ST/STM32 label Oct 26, 2022
细节调整
@mysterywolf mysterywolf added +2 Agree +2 and removed in progress PR/issue in progress. labels Oct 26, 2022
linshire added a commit to linshire/rt-thread that referenced this pull request Oct 29, 2022
mysterywolf pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 29, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
BSP: STM32 BSP related with ST/STM32 +1 Agree +1 +2 Agree +2
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants