v4.1.0 特性征集与讨论 | v4.1.0 discussion #6292
Replies: 57 comments
-
测试框架这部分有啥具体的动作吗? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
直接移除掉吧 借楼整理一下正式发布前需要解决的问题:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
CFLAG flag issue 已解决 #5397 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
MAL: #5379 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
使用rtthread如鲠在喉的一个点:串口终端作为日志输出,即使ulog设置为异步也仍然为阻塞查询输出,占用cpu且输出效率低。 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
希望版本发布后,能与之前的所有包兼容。并且给出从老版本升级到新版本的官方文档。 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
#5277 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
打开之后,仍然很多不兼容的地方。特别是我自己写的应用层(大概8万行代码),用在新内核上很多地方不兼容了,主要是一些宏之类的做了调整,没去细看为什么要这样改,但希望尽量减少这种调整吧,或者用宏都老的定义管起来,但仍然保留。 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
再不改,里边很多东西都变成毒瘤了。 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
请看论坛我发的文章,我刚对串口框架做了个重构,阻塞 io 情况下,降低阻塞时间。 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
所有的 msh 命令,增加 c 函数调用接口,类似 https://gitee.com/thewon/rt_thread_repo/tree/master/user 这里实现的命令一样,既有终端命令入口,也有对等的 c 调用入口。 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
v4.1.0版本release后,可以拉分支出来。然后master也会尝试拉pre-v5.0.0分支,然后把smart相关的一些代码合并。如果春节期间能够合成功,那么再合并回master分支,做为后续的v5.0.x分支而存在。 另外,建议v4.1.0分支也不用做alpha, beta, rc版本,直接出v4.1.0版本,有问题可以快速修正到v4.1.1版本 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
可以一些点上多做沟通,如何在新特性和兼容性上做到平衡 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
FAL添加到 rt-thread 主仓库:#5662 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Finsh 疑似bug |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
第二个源文件被删了吧 https://club.rt-thread.org/ask/question/430704.html |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
是的可以不用管了~ |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@tfx2001 RTT 的 USB 协议栈 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
仓库代码尽量压缩C99的使用需求,如无特殊需求使用CFLAGS或者LOCAL_CFLAGS, 而非CCFLAGS,不要讲C++和C的配置项默认混在一起。 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
为啥不是计划放弃旧版本语法,向新规范靠拢? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
因为不同编译器对新版本语法的支持情况并不相同,因此不适合强制工程直接使用C++11或者C99,用户有需求可以通过sconscript自行定义LOCAL_CCFLAG LOCAL_CFLAG LOCAL_CXXFLAG 参见:https://github.com/mysterywolf/RTduino/blob/master/core/SConscript |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
libc
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
版本控制规范:https://semver.org/ |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
2038的问题 看起来不只是time32改time64这么简单 其他结构体也需要从long改成longlong #5775 (comment) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
v4.0.4 已经发布了,所以我们开始筹备下个版本的发布了,下个版本按计划是一个次版本的更新,将会包含更多的新特性。
如果您也有一些功能想法或对当前计划的看法,请发表评论。
v4.0.4 has been released, so we have started to prepare for the release of the next version. The next version is planned to be a minor version update and will contain more new features.
please comment if you also have some features ideas in mind or share your opinion about the planned features.
Features
BSP
Package
LVGL lvgl/lvgl#2790
Exquisite
Rename finsh to mshOthers
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions